1995
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-993435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vergleich von Unfallhergangstypen im Feld- und Hallenfußball

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their rarity is also confirmed by examination of the prevailing literature, which reveals that serious spinal injuries are described only as case reports. 46,53 Most authors reported the incidence of all neck and back problems as being between 2% and 10%, but without any further specific analyses. 26,38,58 Ekstrand and Gillquist 11 reported that 5% of all injuries occurred in the back, while Schmidt-Olsen et al 52 found a somewhat higher proportion (14.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their rarity is also confirmed by examination of the prevailing literature, which reveals that serious spinal injuries are described only as case reports. 46,53 Most authors reported the incidence of all neck and back problems as being between 2% and 10%, but without any further specific analyses. 26,38,58 Ekstrand and Gillquist 11 reported that 5% of all injuries occurred in the back, while Schmidt-Olsen et al 52 found a somewhat higher proportion (14.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria used to describe the severity of an injury are rarely consistent across studies. 27 Details of severe injuries have been discussed either in terms of case reports of fatal incidents 46,53 or have concerned only commonly injured specific body parts, such as the knee, ankle, hip, and cervical spine. 1,17,32,37,47,57 Few studies about the incidence of injuries in football players of differing ages and skill levels have been published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%