2011
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2011.2138270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of Noise-Parameter Measurements and Uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Randa proposed the use of mismatched transmission lines with a reflection coefficient greater than 0.3 as verification devices. These mismatched transmission lines can be used to simulate a poorly-matched low noise amplifier (LNA) in a coaxial measurement system and provide a consistency check on the system [14]. For verification of an on-wafer noise parameter measurement system, a mismatched planar attenuator was developed [15]: this can represent the input impedance of a typical microwave transistor, however, it is believed that passive devices alone are insufficient to verify noise parameter measurement systems as they lack an effective excess noise ratio (ENR) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, Randa proposed the use of mismatched transmission lines with a reflection coefficient greater than 0.3 as verification devices. These mismatched transmission lines can be used to simulate a poorly-matched low noise amplifier (LNA) in a coaxial measurement system and provide a consistency check on the system [14]. For verification of an on-wafer noise parameter measurement system, a mismatched planar attenuator was developed [15]: this can represent the input impedance of a typical microwave transistor, however, it is believed that passive devices alone are insufficient to verify noise parameter measurement systems as they lack an effective excess noise ratio (ENR) [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active devices, however, require high stability in the test environment, especially under varying temperature and humidity, which is rarely achieved in inter-laboratory trials. In 2011, Randa developed an improved verification method using passive and active devices in a cascade [14]. Some of the aforementioned issues can be overcome by using a hybrid passive-active verification device, however, the fact that the traceability problem for active devices remains unsolved, even at national metrology institutes, is a hindrance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, another method of using a passive two-port network cascaded to an amplifier as a verification device was proposed [8,11,12] in which the noise parameters (NPs) of the passive device and the amplifier were measured separately and then summed. The total NP was compared with the measured NP when they were cascaded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NP of the passive device was derived from its S-parameters and the ambient temperature. This method was demonstrated effective in a coaxially configured measurement system [8,11]. However, the NF shown in those examples is more than 3 dB which is much higher than that of a LNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation