1932
DOI: 10.1007/bf02069898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verruca senilis und Keratoma senile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1934
1934
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Other estimates of up to 20 in 100 may reflect the population studied or a difference in how the investigator defined an actinic keratosis. 4,5 Marks 6 most conservatively estimated that in a given year the chance of an actinic keratosis progressing to a squamous cell carcinoma was 0.075%, low indeed. This was based on the conclusion that 40% of squamous cell carcinomas arise apart from actinic keratoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Other estimates of up to 20 in 100 may reflect the population studied or a difference in how the investigator defined an actinic keratosis. 4,5 Marks 6 most conservatively estimated that in a given year the chance of an actinic keratosis progressing to a squamous cell carcinoma was 0.075%, low indeed. This was based on the conclusion that 40% of squamous cell carcinomas arise apart from actinic keratoses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study emphasizes that these dermopathies, usually asso ciated with the older age-groups, are present at a younger age in transplant patients, in our series as well as in that of Koranda et al [2] which reported dyskeratoses in the age-groups from 19 to 42 years. According to the data from Montgomery and Dorffel [14], about 20% of actinic keratoses observed in the general population may evolve into squamous cell carcinoma. In transplant recipients a more rapid evolution of these dyskeratoses into spinaliomas has been reported [15,16] while others [17] report that transplant patients are 34.4 times more prone to develop squamous cell carcinoma than the control population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a new definition for AKs has been suggested that classifies an AK as a carcinoma in situ of the skin 1,2 . AKs are limited to the epidermis and have no potential to metastasize, yet progression rates from AK to SCC have been estimated between 10 and 20% in one or more of the lesions over a 10‐year period 3–5 . Furthermore, almost 100% of “healthy” skin sites in the immediate surroundings of clinically visible lesions showed characteristic changes of AKs upon histopathologic analysis 6 .…”
Section: Established Hande Histopathology Criteria For the Diagnosis mentioning
confidence: 99%