“…Figure 3i compares the sensitivity obtained in this study with that reported in the literature. [14,32,33,[37][38][39][40][41][42] Compared with other MXene-based flexible sensors, MXene/PDA-based pressure sensors generally exhibit higher sensitivity, such as MXene/PVB-based porous composite sensor (S 1 =11.9 kPa -1 , S 2 =1.15 kPa -1 , S 3 =0.20 kPa -1 ), Ti 3 C 2 Tx/PVDF-TrFE-based composite nanofiber sensor (0.51 kPa -1 ), elastic microstructure-based MXene/PDMS thin film sensor (S 1 =2 kPa -1 , S 2 =0.003 kPa -1 ) MXene@CS@PU-based pressure sensor (3 kPa -1 ), pressure sensor based on MXene/Cotton (12.095 kPa -1 ), pressure sensor based on MXene/PI (22.32 kPa -1 ), thin-film sensor based on LS-MXene/PVA (S 1 =5.5 kPa -1 , S 2 =1.5 kPa -1 ), elastic aerogels of MXene/rGO (22.56 kPa -1 ) and pure MXene-based thin film sensor. In addition, the response and reply times of our proposed sensor are shorter than those mentioned above, enabling higher-accuracy detection.…”