“…There is an extensive class of bi- and polymetallic complexes derived from transition metals, largely Ni II , in tetradentate E 2 S 2 2– (E = N, P, S) binding sites that use excess lone pairs on the cis thiolate sulfurs for binding in a bidentate manner to an additional metal, M′. , Analogous to the (η 5 -C 5 H 4 R)Fe II (P 2 N 2 ) + complexes described above, myriad heterobimetallics have been reported in a developing area that uses η 5 -cyclopentadienide (η 5 -C 5 H 5 or η 5 -C 5 Me 5, i.e., Cp and Cp*, respectively) or η 6 -arenes bound to d 6 Fe II or Ru II , as M′, which in combination with the bridging dithiolates from the NiN 2 S 2 may offer a single open site for reactivity at M′, structure II. ,− The tunability at the π-ligand offers some control for oxidative addition in stoichiometric reactions, including both H 2 and O 2 activation. − Reports of proton reduction under electrochemical conditions by such CpFe II or CpRu II entities are scarce in the literature; however, there are examples of an S′ 2 NiS 2 (S′ = thioether sulfur; S = thiolate sulfur) metalloligand bound to CpFe′ and Cp*Fe′ that demonstrated modest electrocatalysis and H 2 production. , The MN 2 S 2 platform offers opportunity to modify a metallodithiolate ligand by changing only the M, retaining consistency in steric features such that the S-donor and M′-acceptor effects might be deconvoluted. Thus, we have designed experimental and computational protocols to analyze the proton reduction possibilities of the heterobimetallics represented in Scheme .…”