2022
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebral Artery Stenosis: A Narrative Review

Abstract: Vertebral artery stenosis (VAS) is the cause of approximately 20% of ischemic strokes in the posterior circulation. There are several causes of vertebral artery stenosis, including atherosclerosis, calcification, dissections, fibromuscular dysplasia, giant cell arteritis, neurofibromatosis type 1, and bony compressions. The most common cause of VAS is atherosclerosis which is derived from the macrophage-induced oxidation of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), alongside the accumulation of cholesterol. Calcificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia are common risk factors for VAS (Zhang et al, 2017). If not treated in time, it may lead to stroke, Subclavian Steal Syndrome, myocardial infarction, vertebrobasilar insufficiency and even sudden death (Burle et al, 2022). Patients with VAS have a higher risk of recurrent stroke compared with patients with carotid artery stenosis (Xu et al, 2022) and VAS ≥ 50 % is a strong independent predictor of recurrent stroke (Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia are common risk factors for VAS (Zhang et al, 2017). If not treated in time, it may lead to stroke, Subclavian Steal Syndrome, myocardial infarction, vertebrobasilar insufficiency and even sudden death (Burle et al, 2022). Patients with VAS have a higher risk of recurrent stroke compared with patients with carotid artery stenosis (Xu et al, 2022) and VAS ≥ 50 % is a strong independent predictor of recurrent stroke (Zhang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Searls et al, 2012). If VAS is left undiagnosed and unmanaged,it increases the risk of diseases such as cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction and sudden death (Burle et al, 2022), so it is important to accurately evaluate the degree of VAS in patients, and to grasp the hemodynamic characteristics of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intracranial atherosclerosis can be evaluated with conventional angiogram, MR angiogram (MRA), CTA and/or transcranial Doppler; optimal management of intracranial atherosclerosis currently remains an area of debate but includes medical management and/or angioplasty/stent 21. Extracranial vertebral artery atherosclerosis can be evaluated with digital subtraction angiography versus duplex ultrasonography, CTA or MRA; management includes medical, surgical and/or endovascular strategies 22. All plans should include continuous lifelong vascular risk factor optimisation via sustained behavioural modifications (physical activity, diet and nutrition, smoking cessation) and intensive medical therapy as per the 2014 AHA/ASA (American Stroke Association) guidelines 23.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are essential for the accurate diagnosis of cerebrovascular diseases. While DSA remains the gold standard for assessing carotid artery stenosis [ 77 , 78 ], its invasive nature poses a risk to patients. Conventional imaging techniques focus on the vascular lumen, patency, and stenosis, with conventional MR indirectly assessing the degree of lumen stenosis by measuring blood flow velocity.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Imaging Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%