2017
DOI: 10.1177/2192568217699203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebral Column Resection for Rigid Spinal Deformity

Abstract: Study Design:Broad narrative review.Objective:To review the evolution, operative technique, outcomes, and complications associated with posterior vertebral column resection.Methods:A literature review of posterior vertebral column resection was performed. The authors’ surgical technique is outlined in detail. The authors’ experience and the literature regarding vertebral column resection are discussed at length.Results:Treatment of severe, rigid coronal and/or sagittal malalignment with posterior vertebral col… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(76 reference statements)
3
31
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dobbs et al 29 reported no statistically significant differences between the groups for a large-curve AIS .908 treated with posterior spinal fusion and with a combined anterior-posterior spinal fusion with same correction rate of 44%. Shi et al 30 also revealed there was no statistically significant difference between sever rigid scoliosis patients treated with the posterior only approach with an all 1 430 210 3 1 -2 840 280 5 2 -3 520 180 3 1 -4 450 205 3 1 -5 600 190 4 1 -6 590 260 4 1 Transient urinary retention 7 790 290 5 2 -8 810 290 5 2 SIADH 9 460 240 3 1 -10 520 200 3 1 -11 620 250 32 reported 50% to 70% correction in severe rigid coronal or sagittal malalignment after vertebral column resection, but the technique was associated with significant morbidity. Lenke et al 33 reported on PVCR in a series of 35 patients for severe pediatric spinal deformity, with an average preoperative scoliosis of 1158 (798-1508) corrected to 618 (51%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Dobbs et al 29 reported no statistically significant differences between the groups for a large-curve AIS .908 treated with posterior spinal fusion and with a combined anterior-posterior spinal fusion with same correction rate of 44%. Shi et al 30 also revealed there was no statistically significant difference between sever rigid scoliosis patients treated with the posterior only approach with an all 1 430 210 3 1 -2 840 280 5 2 -3 520 180 3 1 -4 450 205 3 1 -5 600 190 4 1 -6 590 260 4 1 Transient urinary retention 7 790 290 5 2 -8 810 290 5 2 SIADH 9 460 240 3 1 -10 520 200 3 1 -11 620 250 32 reported 50% to 70% correction in severe rigid coronal or sagittal malalignment after vertebral column resection, but the technique was associated with significant morbidity. Lenke et al 33 reported on PVCR in a series of 35 patients for severe pediatric spinal deformity, with an average preoperative scoliosis of 1158 (798-1508) corrected to 618 (51%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PVCR provides a greater amount of correction than all other types of spinal osteotomies and allows translational and rotational correction of the vertebral column, but it is much more aggressive due to its more complicated mechanisms, higher technical difficulties and increased technical demands. 13,21 Twelve patients with posttraumatic kyphosis, with a mean local angle of 64.1±6.3° (Range, 55.3-75.2°), were included in our study with a mean follow up period of 13.5±2 (Range, [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] months. All the patients were treated with PVCR of the kyphotic vertebra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Единственным способом радикальной коррекции тяжелого кифоза при запущенной врожденной деформации представляется VCR, предполагающая полное удаление позвонков на вершине кифотической дуги и последующее соединение верхнего и нижнего сегментов позвоночника металлоконструкцией [14,20,22]. Одномоментное значительное изменение геометрии позвоночного канала несет существенный риск: общая частота неврологических осложнений достигает 11,6 % [22], причем в некоторых сериях наблюдений исход в перманентную нижнюю параплегию составил 3 % [17].…”
Section: к линический с лу чайunclassified
“…Одномоментное значительное изменение геометрии позвоночного канала несет существенный риск: общая частота неврологических осложнений достигает 11,6 % [22], причем в некоторых сериях наблюдений исход в перманентную нижнюю параплегию составил 3 % [17]. Операция характеризуется большой ожидаемой кровопотерей [14,22] и высокой вероятностью несостоятельности металлоконструкции: 2,9 % больных в дальнейшем нуждаются в проведении ревизионных вмешательств [17]. Решение выполнить корригирующую вертебротомию у неврологически интактного пациента должно быть строго взвешенным и обоснованным.…”
Section: к линический с лу чайunclassified