Intraoperative diagnosis is essential for providing safe and effective care during cancer surgery 1. The existing workflow for intraoperative diagnosis based on hematoxylin and eosin-staining of processed tissue is time-, resource-, and labor-intensive 2,3. Moreover, interpretation of intraoperative histologic images is dependent on a contracting, unevenly distributed pathology workforce 4. Here, we report a parallel workflow that combines stimulated Raman histology (SRH) 5-7 , a label-free optical imaging method, and deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) to predict diagnosis at the bedside in near real-time in an automated fashion. Specifically, our CNN, trained on over 2.5 million SRH images, predicts brain tumor diagnosis in the operating room in under 150 seconds, an order of magnitude faster than conventional techniques (e.g., 20-30 minutes) 2. In a multicenter, prospective clinical trial (n = 278) we demonstrated that CNN-based diagnosis of SRH images was non-inferior to pathologist-based interpretation of conventional histologic images (overall accuracy, 94.6% vs. 93.9%). Our CNN learned a hierarchy of recognizable histologic feature representations to classify the major histopathologic classes of brain tumors. Additionally, we implemented a semantic segmentation method to identify tumor infiltrated, diagnostic regions within SRH images. These results demonstrate how intraoperative cancer diagnosis can be streamlined, creating a complimentary pathway for tissue diagnosis that is independent of a traditional pathology laboratory.

In extensive bone defects, tissue damage and hypoxia lead to cell death, resulting in slow and incomplete healing. Human embryonic stem cells (hESC) can give rise to all specialized lineages found in healthy bone and are therefore uniquely suited to aid regeneration of damaged bone. We show that the cultivation of hESC-derived mesenchymal progenitors on 3D osteoconductive scaffolds in bioreactors with medium perfusion leads to the formation of large and compact bone constructs. Notably, the implantation of engineered bone in immunodeficient mice for 8 wk resulted in the maintenance and maturation of bone matrix, without the formation of teratomas that is consistently observed when undifferentiated hESCs are implanted, alone or in bone scaffolds. Our study provides a proof of principle that tissue-engineering protocols can be successfully applied to hESC progenitors to grow bone grafts for use in basic and translational studies.tissue regeneration | pluripotent stem cells

Decellularized bone has been widely used as a scaffold for bone formation, due to its similarity to the native bone matrix and excellent osteoinductive and biomechanical properties. We have previously shown that human mesenchymal and embryonic stem cells form functional bone matrix on such scaffolds, without the use of growth factors. In this study, we focused on differences in bone matrix that exist even among identical harvesting sites, and the effects of the matrix architecture and mineral content on bone formation by human embryonic stem cells (hESC). Mesenchymal progenitors derived from hESCs were cultured for 5 weeks in decellularized bone scaffolds with three different densities: low (0.281 ± 0.018 mg/mm3), medium (0.434 ± 0.015 mg/mm3) and high (0.618 ± 0.027 mg/mm3). The medium-density group yielded highest densities of cells and newly assembled bone matrix, presumably due to the best balance between the transport of nutrients and metabolites to and from the cells, space for cell infiltration, surface for cell attachment and the mechanical strength of the scaffolds, all of which depend on the scaffold density. Bone mineral was beneficial for the higher expression of bone markers in cultured cells and more robust accumulation of the new bone matrix.

Substantial variability in outcome reporting patterns exists among high-impact studies of ACL reconstruction. Such variability may create challenges in interpreting results and pooling them across different studies.

Study Design:Broad narrative review.Objective:To review the evolution, operative technique, outcomes, and complications associated with posterior vertebral column resection.Methods:A literature review of posterior vertebral column resection was performed. The authors’ surgical technique is outlined in detail. The authors’ experience and the literature regarding vertebral column resection are discussed at length.Results:Treatment of severe, rigid coronal and/or sagittal malalignment with posterior vertebral column resection results in approximately 50–70% correction depending on the type of deformity. Surgical site infection rates range from 2.9% to 9.7%. Transient and permanent neurologic injury rates range from 0% to 13.8% and 0% to 6.3%, respectively. Although there are significant variations in EBL throughout the literature, it can be minimized by utilizing tranexamic acid intraoperatively.Conclusion:The ability to correct a rigid deformity in the spine relies on osteotomies. Each osteotomy is associated with a particular magnitude of correction at a single level. Posterior vertebral column resection is the most powerful posterior osteotomy method providing a successful correction of fixed complex deformities. Despite meticulous surgical technique and precision, this robust osteotomy technique can be associated with significant morbidity even in the most experienced hands.