2013
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Differentiation with Variety-Seeking Consumers

Abstract: W e analyze price and quality competition in a vertically differentiated duopoly in which consumers have a preference for variety. The preference for variety is a consequence of diminishing marginal utility for repeated experiences with the same product. We find consumer variety seeking can either soften or intensify price competition, depending on the difference in firm qualities and the strength of consumer preference for variety. When the qualities are similar (or the consumer preference for variety is stro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we still find a medium effect of LN_NUMRES on RANGE under horizontal differentiation. This might be explained by idiosyncratic quality differences pertaining to different Ethnic Restaurant types and by theoretical findings of Zeithammer and Thomadsen (2013), who find that under certain conditions, two horizontally differentiated restaurants also differentiate vertically. In summary, comparing the coefficients from Table 6 (horizontal case) with those from Tables 4 and 5 (vertical case), H3 is supported.…”
Section: The Effect Of Horizontal Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we still find a medium effect of LN_NUMRES on RANGE under horizontal differentiation. This might be explained by idiosyncratic quality differences pertaining to different Ethnic Restaurant types and by theoretical findings of Zeithammer and Thomadsen (2013), who find that under certain conditions, two horizontally differentiated restaurants also differentiate vertically. In summary, comparing the coefficients from Table 6 (horizontal case) with those from Tables 4 and 5 (vertical case), H3 is supported.…”
Section: The Effect Of Horizontal Differentiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, assume that C(q) is continuous, increasing and convex, which can be thought of as having increasingly more expensive production capacity or input (e.g., supplied materials). Such an assumption is commonly used in economics and marketing literatures (e.g., Kalai et al 1992;Porteus 2002, Ha et al 2011Laffont and Mortimort 2002;Zeithammer and Thomadsen 2013). It is supported by empirical evidence in industries such as petroleum refining (Griffin 1972) and auto-making (Mollick 2004).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There are two other research streams indirectly related to our research. The first one uses the vertical product differentiation framework to consider entry deterrence problems and quality choice strategies in operations domain (see, for example, Vandenbosch and Weinberg [23]; Desai [24]; Noh and Moschini [25]; Lauga and Ofek [26]; Zeithammer and Thomadsen [27]). In this stream, products quality can be designed in the process of production to examine how the incumbent's choice of product quality depends on the threat strategies of entrant.…”
Section: Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%