2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1146-609x(01)01118-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical distribution and seasonal changes of fine and coarse root mass in Pinus kesiya Royle Ex.Gordon forest of three different ages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported a high density of fine roots in the upper soil layer, with approximately 70-90% of fine roots in the upper 20 cm of soil John et al 2001). Preliminary studies at our site showed the proportion of fine root biomass in the upper 20 cm of soil to be 71.1% on the upper slope and 85.3% on the lower slope (Hirobe et al, personal communication).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Several studies have reported a high density of fine roots in the upper soil layer, with approximately 70-90% of fine roots in the upper 20 cm of soil John et al 2001). Preliminary studies at our site showed the proportion of fine root biomass in the upper 20 cm of soil to be 71.1% on the upper slope and 85.3% on the lower slope (Hirobe et al, personal communication).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Quite a few workers in Poplar (Dickman et al, 1996;Lukac et al, 2003;Al Afas et al, 2008) and other species like scot pine, Japanese cedar, Khasi pine etc. (Friend et al, 2000;John et al, 2001;Janssens et al, 2002;Konopka et al, 2005Konopka et al, & 2006 also reported concentration of fine roots in upper layer. This variation of root concentration may be due to varied presence of coarse root, nutrient and moisture availability, soil structure, temperature and microbial activity in different soil layers.…”
Section: Fine and Coarse Root Distributionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The more common core-break sampling method (Babu et al 2001;Burke and Raynal 1994;Büttner and Leuschner 1994;Hendriks and Bianchi 1995;Schmid and Kazda 2002;Xu et al 1997) was discarded because RAR estimation from root biomass, root number or root length, implies hypotheses about the 3D distribution of roots inside the sample (Lopez-Zamora et al 2002).…”
Section: Tensile Strength Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%