1984
DOI: 10.1139/z84-215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical distribution of young pond snails (Basommatophora: Pulmonata): implications for survival

Abstract: The vertical distribution of juvenile pond snails (Lymnaea stagnalis and Stagnicola elodes), hatched from egg masses containing known numbers of viable embryos, was recorded daily in artificial containers under outdoor conditions for up to 25 days after hatching. Both species showed an initial vertical movement to the surface of the water with a subsequent return to the bottom sediments after 10–15 days. This pattern was consistent despite differences in the depth of the water column (13 versus 18.5 cm). At 25… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That the actual number adhering to the feather was between 9-and 22-fold greater than the expected value suggests that when snails contacted the feather they remained adherent to it longer than they otherwise might remain within an area of equal size on the surface tension of the water. This argument is strengthened when one considers that the actual pattern of dispersion of young snails tends not to be random but clumped on the lower walls and bottom of the container (Boag et al 1984). Thus, these observations suggest that the snails were attracted either to the feather itself as to the air-water-plumage interface, a phenomenon similar to the concentration of young snails recorded at the air-water-container wall interface by Boag et al (1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That the actual number adhering to the feather was between 9-and 22-fold greater than the expected value suggests that when snails contacted the feather they remained adherent to it longer than they otherwise might remain within an area of equal size on the surface tension of the water. This argument is strengthened when one considers that the actual pattern of dispersion of young snails tends not to be random but clumped on the lower walls and bottom of the container (Boag et al 1984). Thus, these observations suggest that the snails were attracted either to the feather itself as to the air-water-plumage interface, a phenomenon similar to the concentration of young snails recorded at the air-water-container wall interface by Boag et al (1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“….". Boag et al (1984) suggested that, among gastropods, the propensity for newly hatched snails to rise to the surface of the water column, and in some cases to crawl above it onto objects either floating or fixed, may be a mechanism to aid passive dispersal. This could be particularly important when such Can.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used three geographically distinct populations of freshly collected snails from (1) (Clarke, 1981;Clifford, 1991) as well as descriptions from other published studies in a similar localities in both The Netherlands and Alberta (Mooijvog et al, 1973;Boag and Pearlstone, 1979;Jager et al, 1979;Boag et al, 1984). In order to further ensure that both the Albertan and Dutch snails were in fact the same species, cross breeding experiments were conducted to ensure that the progeny of the initial crosses (F1s) produced viable offspring (F2s).…”
Section: Materials and Methods Snailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All collected snails were L. stagnalis. They were identified using the keys of Clarke (Clarke, 1981) and Clifford (Clifford, 1991), as well as descriptions from published works in similar localities in Alberta (Boag and Pearlstone, 1979;Boag et al, 1984). We do not know when or how L. stagnalis was introduced to the 20+ year old Jackson pond.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Snailsmentioning
confidence: 99%