1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5489(99)92287-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical metrology using scanning-probe microscopes: Imaging distortions and measurement repeatability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Nano-Crystallography Group, Department of Physics, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA. 2 Intel, Hillsboro, OR, USA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 Nano-Crystallography Group, Department of Physics, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA. 2 Intel, Hillsboro, OR, USA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Crystallographic notations such as p4 and basic 2D crystallography are briefly discussed in "Appendix A".) Using Photoshop, 2 we have artificially constructed in Fig. 1b an image somewhat akin to what one would see with three SPM tips shifted laterally and vertically with respect to each other, simultaneously scanning the same surface, with signals beating against each other.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correction of scanner bow in data processing has been the subject of previous investigations by others. [25][26] In Fig. 9, we illustrate an elementary correction method that we used for analysis of our preliminary data.…”
Section: Vendor Spec On Non-linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future work, we are considering the possibility of implementing a more elaborate scanner bow correction methodology developed by Edwards, et al 26 This method involves the simultaneous fitting of both a polynomial and a step function to the scan lines. This would have the advantage of using more of the available data, and the residual impact of scanner bow on the apparent step heights is expected to be much smaller.…”
Section: Vendor Spec On Non-linearitymentioning
confidence: 99%