“…The mechanical strengths reported in the published literature varied widely owing to the differences in raw materials (e.g., attribute and recipe), curing condition (e.g., temperature and moisture) and sample preparation technology (e.g., size and age). The 28 days compressive strengths of the geopolymer obtained from literature survey, including low-and high-calcium AAS geopolymers in addition to SAP geopolymers, are shown in Figure 6 (Davidovits, 2011;Chindaprasirt et al, 2012Chindaprasirt et al, , 2013bNath and Kumar, 2013;Nematollahi and Sanjayan, 2014;Atiş et al, 2015;Guo et al, 2016;He et al, 2016;Reddy et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016;Wang, 2018). Clearly, the statistics showed that the compressive strengths of the AAS geopolymer (i.e., 15-65 MPa for low-calcium series and 70-110 MPa for high-calcium series) significantly outperformed that of the SAP geopolymer (i.e., 10-50 MPa).…”