1994
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(94)00922-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very light neutralino in nonminimal supersymmetric model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New parameters in the neutralino sector are the singlet vacuum expectation value x and the trilinear couplings λ and κ in the superpotential. 5 A scenario with a singlino-like lightest neutralino (Table 1) leads to significantly different signatures compared to the MSSM. 6 In this case the masses and mixings of the neutralinosχ 0 2,...,5 correspond toχ 0 1,...,4 of the MSSM with µ = λx.…”
Section: Nmssmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New parameters in the neutralino sector are the singlet vacuum expectation value x and the trilinear couplings λ and κ in the superpotential. 5 A scenario with a singlino-like lightest neutralino (Table 1) leads to significantly different signatures compared to the MSSM. 6 In this case the masses and mixings of the neutralinosχ 0 2,...,5 correspond toχ 0 1,...,4 of the MSSM with µ = λx.…”
Section: Nmssmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] do not restrict the other parameters of the NMSSM and do not lead to neutralino mass bounds. Kim et al [13], [14], [15] also calculate cross sections for the production of neutralinos for special values of the parameters of the NMSSM but leave the question open if and in which parameter region a massless neutralino is still compatible with experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above arguments make an intensive study of the NMSSM very desirable. While the implications for supersymmetric phenomenology have already been studied to some extent [22,24,25,26], one finds, however, only incomplete lists of Feynman rules for the NMSSM in the literature [11,27,28]. Furthermore, different sign conventions for the parameters in the superpotential have been established [21,22,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%