2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Veterinary antimicrobial residues in pork meat in Cyprus: An exposure assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A microbial screening method was used for the determination of antibiotic residues in 15,484 raw pork meat samples. A total of 1766 samples suspected positive samples were analyzed by means of a tandem LC-MS/MS confirmatory method which was presented in detail in our previously published work [ 47 ]. From this research, 13 veterinary antibiotic residues including one aminoglycoside, one fluoroquinolone, one lincosamide, one macrolide, one β-lactam, three sulfonamides, one dehydroreductase inhibitor, and four tetracyclines were detected in 596 positive samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A microbial screening method was used for the determination of antibiotic residues in 15,484 raw pork meat samples. A total of 1766 samples suspected positive samples were analyzed by means of a tandem LC-MS/MS confirmatory method which was presented in detail in our previously published work [ 47 ]. From this research, 13 veterinary antibiotic residues including one aminoglycoside, one fluoroquinolone, one lincosamide, one macrolide, one β-lactam, three sulfonamides, one dehydroreductase inhibitor, and four tetracyclines were detected in 596 positive samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current dietary exposure assessment was based on the results about the occurrence of 45 residual antibiotics in pork meat samples in Cyprus between 2012 and 2017 [ 47 ]. The lower-bound (LB) approach was used for the left censored data of the microbial screening method and the results below the limit of detection (LOD) were replaced by zero [ 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations