1980
DOI: 10.21236/ada112093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VFM Discrimination Results from a Ten Station Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results corroborate those of Savino et al (1980) and confirm that their observations were not strongly affected by the selection of many earthquakes from different geophysical environments (e.g. the Hindu Kush).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results corroborate those of Savino et al (1980) and confirm that their observations were not strongly affected by the selection of many earthquakes from different geophysical environments (e.g. the Hindu Kush).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Because the arrays are situated in stable regions, they are ideal for spectral discrimination (cf. Savino, Archambeau & Masso 1980). Also, because of their relatively broadband response, we are able to examine the performance of the spectral discriminants at higher frequencies relative to previous studies made on narrow band systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now that we have completed our theoretical analysis of the rno:Ms and VFM discriminants, we want to compare our predictions with a set of observations. First, for the VFM discriminant we use a result taken from Savino et al [1980]. With ideal data we predict separation of earthquakes and explosions down to approximately magnitude 4.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variable frequency magnitude discriminant is based on the observation that body waves from explosions contain more high-frequency energy than body waves from earthquakes of comparable size. Several methods of implemenation exist for the VFM discriminant, and we will confine this discussion to the method described by Savino et al [1980]. The method consists of applying a "comb" of narrow-band filters over a range of frequencies from 0.4 to 4.0 Hz to a shortperiod seismogram.…”
Section: Variable Frequency Magnitude Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allen (1978), Shensa (1977), Savino (1979). This, perhaps, derived from the fact that there has never been a direct comparison on the same data base of the optimum detector to other single channel detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%