2014
DOI: 10.3390/s140610598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibration Sensor-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Ellipsoid-ARTMAP and Differential Evolution Algorithms

Abstract: Effective fault classification of rolling element bearings provides an important basis for ensuring safe operation of rotating machinery. In this paper, a novel vibration sensor-based fault diagnosis method using an Ellipsoid-ARTMAP network (EAM) and a differential evolution (DE) algorithm is proposed. The original features are firstly extracted from vibration signals based on wavelet packet decomposition. Then, a minimum-redundancy maximum-relevancy algorithm is introduced to select the most prominent feature… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further WPD for feature extraction and mRMR for feature selection and DE-EAM for classification are employed and average accuracy of 96.1% is obtained. Similarly spectrum imaging and feature enhancement is applied for feature extraction, and classification is realized using ANN by the authors in [22] for dataset Ai with 2HP load and obtains an accuracy of 96.9%. Data setA-iii is assessed for load 0, 1 and 2HP using 20 features by authors in [18] and attained an accuracy of 99.56%,100%,99.89% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further WPD for feature extraction and mRMR for feature selection and DE-EAM for classification are employed and average accuracy of 96.1% is obtained. Similarly spectrum imaging and feature enhancement is applied for feature extraction, and classification is realized using ANN by the authors in [22] for dataset Ai with 2HP load and obtains an accuracy of 96.9%. Data setA-iii is assessed for load 0, 1 and 2HP using 20 features by authors in [18] and attained an accuracy of 99.56%,100%,99.89% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis using WT methodology [13] suffers a major setback due compared the results thus obtained for variation in parameters like accuracy, sensitivity and specificity with that obtained using LDA classifier. The results evince that time domain features identify the bearing faults with good accuracy compared to other features considered in the literature [2], [13][14], [17][18][19][20][21][22]. Overall 63 feature set combinations from 6 features have been employed for bearing fault diagnosis of 5 groups of data involving 15 datasets which has been drawn in combinations of location of fault and load condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many published references [7,21,22], the authors analyzed only a few fault types, and the training data and the testing data have the same speed and load. However, the running conditions of bearing are very complex in engineering application, and the fault diagnosis method should be robust and insensible to the variation of speed and load.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For recent advances in DE, the readers are referred to [16,17]. EAs suit a variety of applications in the fields of engineering and science [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Generally, EAs outperform traditional optimization algorithms for problems which are not continuous, non-differentiable, multi-modal, noisy and not well-defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%