2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational Relaxation of Highly Vibrationally Excited CO Scattered from Au(111): Evidence for CO Formation

Abstract: Electronically nonadiabatic dynamics can be important in collisions of molecules at surfaces; for example, when vibrational degrees of freedom of molecules are coupled to electron-hole-pair (EHP) excitation of a metal. Such dynamics have been inferred from a host of observations involving multiquantum relaxation of NO molecules scattered from metal surfaces. Electron transfer forming transient NO– is thought to be essential to the nonadiabatic coupling. The question remains: is this behavior usual? Here, we pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When E v (r out ) À F B À3.5 eV, the required ICS is smaller, and the molecule need only approach to within 2.2 Å to reach the curve crossing for ET. Hence, the distance of the molecule's closest approach appears to be in the region of 1.75 and 2.2 Å-these values agree well with DFT calculations for the repulsive wall which give 1.9 Å for CO/Au(111), 33 2.0 Å for NO/Au(111), 33 2.2 Å for CO/Ag(111), 37 and 1.9 Å for NO/Ag(111). 37 Here, we estimate the position of the repulsive wall by calculating the molecule-surface distance at which the interaction energy reaches a value of 0.5 eV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When E v (r out ) À F B À3.5 eV, the required ICS is smaller, and the molecule need only approach to within 2.2 Å to reach the curve crossing for ET. Hence, the distance of the molecule's closest approach appears to be in the region of 1.75 and 2.2 Å-these values agree well with DFT calculations for the repulsive wall which give 1.9 Å for CO/Au(111), 33 2.0 Å for NO/Au(111), 33 2.2 Å for CO/Ag(111), 37 and 1.9 Å for NO/Ag(111). 37 Here, we estimate the position of the repulsive wall by calculating the molecule-surface distance at which the interaction energy reaches a value of 0.5 eV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…11 and CO(v i = 17)/Au(111). 33 For both CO and NO, the relaxation probability increases with v i . For similar v i , the NO relaxation probability is larger than that of CO. Molecule-surface systems with a relaxation probability between 0 and 1 exhibit a pronounced dependence on E i .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations