1977
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.43.519
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibronic Theory of the Stark Effects on the Relaxed Excited State of the F Center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, we needed to impose two restrictions on E s ðQÞ; E x;ðyÞ ðQÞ and E z ðQÞ in the vicinity of their minimum points, in order to ultimately determine them by using the results of the mixing parameters a 2 1 and a 2 2 : The 2s-2p separation D in the RES of the F center in KCl can be used as one of the restrictions, since the relaxation process for the F A2 band excitation is very similar to that in the F center in KCl. We set the difference between the minimum values of E x;ðyÞ ðQÞ and E s ðQÞ to be equal to D; which is 33:5 meV [19], and place the other restriction on E z ðQÞ by assuming that E z ðQÞ takes the same minimum value as that of E s ðQÞ at the same point. Under these reasonable conditions, we used the following relation between a 2 1 (or a 2 2 ) and the adiabatic potential energies, where X i ¼ ½E i ðQÞ À E s ðQÞ=j2V sp;i j: Here, i ¼ 1 and 2 correspond to F A1 and F A2 band excitation, respectively; E 1 ðQÞ and E 2 ðQÞ stand for E z ðQÞ and E x;ðyÞ ðQÞ; respectively; and V sp;i is an interaction parameter for the 2s-2p mixing.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, we needed to impose two restrictions on E s ðQÞ; E x;ðyÞ ðQÞ and E z ðQÞ in the vicinity of their minimum points, in order to ultimately determine them by using the results of the mixing parameters a 2 1 and a 2 2 : The 2s-2p separation D in the RES of the F center in KCl can be used as one of the restrictions, since the relaxation process for the F A2 band excitation is very similar to that in the F center in KCl. We set the difference between the minimum values of E x;ðyÞ ðQÞ and E s ðQÞ to be equal to D; which is 33:5 meV [19], and place the other restriction on E z ðQÞ by assuming that E z ðQÞ takes the same minimum value as that of E s ðQÞ at the same point. Under these reasonable conditions, we used the following relation between a 2 1 (or a 2 2 ) and the adiabatic potential energies, where X i ¼ ½E i ðQÞ À E s ðQÞ=j2V sp;i j: Here, i ¼ 1 and 2 correspond to F A1 and F A2 band excitation, respectively; E 1 ðQÞ and E 2 ðQÞ stand for E z ðQÞ and E x;ðyÞ ðQÞ; respectively; and V sp;i is an interaction parameter for the 2s-2p mixing.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) has been derived from a semiclassical calculation where the mixing interaction between 2s and 2p states is assumed to be constant [11]. Under the conditions E s ð0Þ ¼ 2:36 eV; E x;ðyÞ ð0Þ ¼ 2:25 eV [7], O x ¼ 1:87 eV; D ¼ 33:5 meV [19], and by taking V sp;2 as a free parameter, we have firstly determined E s ðQÞ and E x;ðyÞ ðQÞ so as to reproduce the O-dependence of a 2 2 deduced from the experiment. The best fitting represented with a broken line in Fig.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of completeness we will add the following terms, W -N G -W+nG and WEflR -WTnR in the right-hand side of (26) …”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. In the FCS, the 2p state is lower than the 2s state [10], but in the RES, the 2p state lies above the 2s state [11]. Thus, the 2s and 2p levels cross each other between the FCS and RES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%