1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1984.tb01085.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Victim Readjustment Following Assault

Abstract: A growing literature on the impact of assuult has given little considerution to the factors contributing to variations in victim reuction. This paper reviews the preassault and postassault variables that are associated with the recovery process. Among key factors ure the psychosocial resources of the victim at entry to the crisis and the violence qf the assault itsev; however, variables often contribute differentially at different points in the recovery process. Subsequenr discussion focuses on the methodologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
95
1
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
95
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas numerous studies have been conducted to describe the psychosocial consequences of particular types of victimization (e.g., Freedy, Resnick, Kilpatrick, Dansky, & Tidwell, 1994;Frieze, Greenberg, & Hymer, 1987;Kilpatrick, Saunders, Veronen, Best, & Von, 1987;Sales, Baum, & Shore, 1984), only a handful compare symptoms across crime types (Davis & Brickman, 1996;Lurigio, 1987;Resick, 1987;Riggs & Foa, 1995;Wirtz & Harrell, 1987), and even fewer are specific to bias crime victimization Ehrlich, Larcom, & Purvis, 1994;Ephross, Barnes, Ehrlich, Sandnes, & Weiss, 1986;Herek, Cogan, & Gillis, 1999;. In part due to methodological issues, the results of these studies on bias crime victimization are somewhat inconsistent in their conclusions.…”
Section: Prior Literature On Hate Crime Victimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas numerous studies have been conducted to describe the psychosocial consequences of particular types of victimization (e.g., Freedy, Resnick, Kilpatrick, Dansky, & Tidwell, 1994;Frieze, Greenberg, & Hymer, 1987;Kilpatrick, Saunders, Veronen, Best, & Von, 1987;Sales, Baum, & Shore, 1984), only a handful compare symptoms across crime types (Davis & Brickman, 1996;Lurigio, 1987;Resick, 1987;Riggs & Foa, 1995;Wirtz & Harrell, 1987), and even fewer are specific to bias crime victimization Ehrlich, Larcom, & Purvis, 1994;Ephross, Barnes, Ehrlich, Sandnes, & Weiss, 1986;Herek, Cogan, & Gillis, 1999;. In part due to methodological issues, the results of these studies on bias crime victimization are somewhat inconsistent in their conclusions.…”
Section: Prior Literature On Hate Crime Victimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Victim-related Prior adjustment problems Sales et al, 1984) Past history of drug or alcohol misuse (Burgess & Holmstrom, 1978) History of prior sexual victimisation (Ellis et al, 1981;Ruch & Chandler, 1983) Assault-related Nature of assault -completed z'. attempted rape Perception of life threat Physical injury (Kilpatrick et al, 1987) Post-assault High levels of distress in the immediate aftermath (Rothbaum et al, 1992) Lack of social support (Norris & FeldmanSummers, 1981;Ruch & Chandler, 1983) Various approaches should be considered depending on the victim's stage of recovery and the nature and extent of the conditions being treated.…”
Section: Box 2 Impediments To Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ce qui a trait à l'augmentation du soutien émotionnel avec le temps, nos résultats vont dans le même sens que ceux obtenus par Sales et al (1984) qui notent l'impact favorable du soutien émotionnel chez les victimes d'agression sexuelle avec le temps. Par contre, nos résultats n'appuient pas ceux de Miller et al (1982) ni ceux de Golding et al (2002) qui notent un soutien émotionnel faible de la part des conjoints.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified