Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1282280.1282336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video copy detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is preferable to use searching methods that are looking for a close match of the query instead of an exact match. This problem is a nearest neighbor problem in the binary space [29], which can be simply handled by an exhaustive search but the computational requirement is extremely high. For a practical CBCD system, the size of the video database is huge with tens of millions of videos; fast approximate search algorithms are commonly used.…”
Section: Tiri-sbvf Based Content-based Copy Detection Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is preferable to use searching methods that are looking for a close match of the query instead of an exact match. This problem is a nearest neighbor problem in the binary space [29], which can be simply handled by an exhaustive search but the computational requirement is extremely high. For a practical CBCD system, the size of the video database is huge with tens of millions of videos; fast approximate search algorithms are commonly used.…”
Section: Tiri-sbvf Based Content-based Copy Detection Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 shows that MMMV and MPMV algorithms consume less space for signatures than the other algorithms except the method called "Temporal" [9].…”
Section: Number Of Feature Parameters Per Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing methods of video CBCD usually extract signatures, key frames, or fingerprints from the images of video stream and compare them with the database that contains the features of original videos [2,6,[13][14][15][16]. Several spatial or temporal features of videos are considered as signatures of videos such as intensity of pixels, color histograms, and motion [3,9]. The main advantage of CBCD over watermarking is that signature extraction can be done even if the video is distributed over the Internet or other media because the unique signature is part of the video itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yapılan deneylerde görsel ipuçları kullanılarak elde edilen yerel tanımlayıcıların daha fazla hesaplama gücü gerektirmesine ragmen global tanımlayıcılara göre daha gürbüz çalıştıkları gözlenmiştir [3]. Video içerisindeki görsel ipuçları renk, doku veya hareket gibi farklı kaynaklardan üretilebilir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified