2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2018.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video quality assessment accounting for temporal visual masking of local flicker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper addresses this gap by building on the recent research on HVS-based stereoscopic video quality assessment and generalising it to incorporate for the first time a physiologically inspired model of motion sensitivity. The importance of considering motion sensitivity in enhancing the accuracy of 2D video quality assessment modelling was highlighted in previous research [37], [38]. This importance is particularly magnified for realising a precise 3D video quality assessment model.…”
Section: Stereoscopic Video Quality Metricsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This paper addresses this gap by building on the recent research on HVS-based stereoscopic video quality assessment and generalising it to incorporate for the first time a physiologically inspired model of motion sensitivity. The importance of considering motion sensitivity in enhancing the accuracy of 2D video quality assessment modelling was highlighted in previous research [37], [38]. This importance is particularly magnified for realising a precise 3D video quality assessment model.…”
Section: Stereoscopic Video Quality Metricsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Temporal-memory effect is another important clue for designing objective VQA models (Park et al 2013;Seshadrinathan and Bovik 2011;Xu et al 2014;Choi and Bovik 2018;Kim et al 2018). It induces that video quality rating is influenced by historic memory.…”
Section: Modeling Of Temporal-memory Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal masking is one of the important aspect of human visual system (HVS), which has proven to an impact on perception of video artifacts. Choi et al, [11], analyzed the influence of motion on the performance of image level quality metrics after dividing LIVE VQA database into two subsets of low-level motions and highlevel motion contents. Their results revealed that many frame-based quality metrics such as PSNR, perform poor in case of high-level motion content.…”
Section: Video Quality Prediction Phasementioning
confidence: 99%