2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00591-020-00274-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viel Beweisen, kaum Rechnen? Gestaltungsmerkmale mathematischer Übungsaufgaben im Studium

Abstract: Zusammenfassung Übungsaufgaben erfüllen im Mathematikstudium zentrale Funktionen. Allerdings ist bisher kaum systematisch untersucht, welche Gestaltungsmerkmale sie aufweisen und welche Ziele Dozierende mit ihren Übungsaufgaben verfolgen. In einem kontrastierenden Ansatz wurden 277 Übungsaufgaben aus vier Lehrveranstaltungen hinsichtlich ihrer Gestaltungsmerkmale untersucht und klassifiziert. Ergänzend wurden in einer Interviewstudie die zugehörigen Lernziele der Dozierenden ermittelt und mit den Ergebnissen v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, Engelbrecht (2010, p. 143) stated that "most students' perception of being successful in mathematics in school does not involve much inquiry but mostly just the application of different methods". Comparing typical tasks at university with typical tasks in school, a clear shift to proving is reported (Vollstedt et al, 2014;Weber & Lindmeier, 2020). As these proving tasks usually cannot be solved by using only schematic calculations or algorithms and most students are unfamiliar with formal proofs when entering university (De Guzman et al, 1998), cognitive and affective problems can occur when students have to deal with proofs on their own: cognitive in the sense that they are not able to cope with homework tasks and affective in the sense that they do not dare to work on the tasks to avoid failures and that they are more interested in school mathematics, focusing on schematic calculations, compared to university mathematics, focusing on proofs.…”
Section: Characteristics Of University Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Engelbrecht (2010, p. 143) stated that "most students' perception of being successful in mathematics in school does not involve much inquiry but mostly just the application of different methods". Comparing typical tasks at university with typical tasks in school, a clear shift to proving is reported (Vollstedt et al, 2014;Weber & Lindmeier, 2020). As these proving tasks usually cannot be solved by using only schematic calculations or algorithms and most students are unfamiliar with formal proofs when entering university (De Guzman et al, 1998), cognitive and affective problems can occur when students have to deal with proofs on their own: cognitive in the sense that they are not able to cope with homework tasks and affective in the sense that they do not dare to work on the tasks to avoid failures and that they are more interested in school mathematics, focusing on schematic calculations, compared to university mathematics, focusing on proofs.…”
Section: Characteristics Of University Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, students have to hand in weekly homework tasks. Sometimes, by solving these tasks correctly, students can earn extra points for the final exams, or solving tasks is mandatory in order to be allowed to participate in the exams (Weber & Lindmeier, 2020). Handedin tasks are graded by teaching assistants.…”
Section: Mathematical Learning Processes At School and At Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This general shift involves differences in the way new content is presented during lessons and lectures as well as differences in the tasks students have to solve (cf. Bergsten, 2007;de Guzmán et al, 1998;Luk, 2005;Weber & Lindmeier, 2020).…”
Section: Mathematical Learning Processes At School and At Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation