Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East A 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1101389.1101394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

View-dependent tetrahedral meshing and rendering

Abstract: Figure 1: The left figure shows how the mesh is adapted to the view point (red circle). The middle picture shows a close-up view of the model. The border faces of the tetrahedral mesh indicate the level of detail overlaid by our point based rendering technique. The middle-right picture shows the point based technique supported by silhouettes. The right picture shows a typical volume image created by projected tetrahedra. AbstractInteractive exploration of huge tetrahedral meshes is required by many application… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach also supports selective refinement queries. Sondershaus et al (2005) propose a segmentation-based mesh representation of volume data, which allows view-dependent refinement using a hierarchy of pre-constructed segments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach also supports selective refinement queries. Sondershaus et al (2005) propose a segmentation-based mesh representation of volume data, which allows view-dependent refinement using a hierarchy of pre-constructed segments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iRun approach [VCS*07] is an out‐of‐core extension of the sample‐based LOD method [CCSS05], where no connectivity or mesh LOD is maintained. As mentioned in Section 1, [SS06b] performs out‐of‐core simplification and LOD volume rendering for tetrahedral meshes, but it uses the simple approach of not simplifying the sub‐volume boundaries at all. The only such approach that addresses the issue of crack‐free LOD is [SS06a], which is based on [CGG*05] and we discuss them together below.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technically, it is desirable to avoid this problem and achieve a crack‐free LOD mesh, namely, any neighboring sub‐volumes in a selected LOD have consistent boundaries , and all the cells in the LOD are fold‐over free (i.e., do not have negative volumes). A simple solution (as in [SS06b]) would be not to simplify the boundary cells until at a higher level where these cells become interior to an ancestor sub‐volume. But for those cells that are initially cut at the top level, they cannot be simplified until at the tree root (i.e., at the very end of simplification), which is undesirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several representation schemes were developed to support multiresolution tetrahedral meshes [64,15,14,35,19,16,18,20,59]. In more direct relevance to our work, Szymczak and Rossignac [61] propose the Grow&Fold compression algorithm for tetrahedral meshes.…”
Section: Background and Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%