1995
DOI: 10.1080/00131729509335069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewing Talent Development Longitudinally: An Aid to Policymaking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most direct way to investigate long-term outcomes is to study the same individuals over time. However, longitudinal designs are not immune to threats to validity, including maturation, attrition, and time-ofmeasurement effects (Campbell & Stanley, 1966;Subotnik & Arnold, 1995). Maturation refers to difficulty in identifying whether change is the result of natural development or a given experience or treatment.…”
Section: Longitudinal Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most direct way to investigate long-term outcomes is to study the same individuals over time. However, longitudinal designs are not immune to threats to validity, including maturation, attrition, and time-ofmeasurement effects (Campbell & Stanley, 1966;Subotnik & Arnold, 1995). Maturation refers to difficulty in identifying whether change is the result of natural development or a given experience or treatment.…”
Section: Longitudinal Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications of reading a life backwards come in "educating a life forwards." The program data, specifically predictive and longitudinal data, would be used to refocus the GT program continually (Subotnik & Arnold, 1995) and, of course, its methods of selection. What is more, the GT program would have to establish a strong alumni group, something new for public school GT programs, so that the program's successes at different times could be documented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%