2009
DOI: 10.1167/9.2.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces

Abstract: In everyday life, human faces are encountered in many different views. Despite this fact, most psychological research has focused on the perception of frontal faces. To address this shortcoming, the current study investigated how different face views are processed, by measuring eye movements to frontal, mid-profile and profile faces during a gender categorization (Experiment 1) and a free-viewing task (Experiment 2). In both experiments observers initially fixated the geometric center of a face, independent of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
125
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(67 reference statements)
19
125
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All eye-tracking data was recorded until the participants' responded in both the learning and the recognition phase of the experiment. Incidentally, we also conducted an analysis on area-normalised (calculated by dividing the proportion of time spent fixating in the AOI by the proportion of the screen the AOI occupied, see Bindemann, Scheepers, & Burton, 2009;Fletcher-Watson, Findlay, Leekam, & Benson, 2008) AOIs in order to deal with the unequal sizes of the AOIs. These results were identical to the non-normalised data.…”
Section: Eye-tracking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All eye-tracking data was recorded until the participants' responded in both the learning and the recognition phase of the experiment. Incidentally, we also conducted an analysis on area-normalised (calculated by dividing the proportion of time spent fixating in the AOI by the proportion of the screen the AOI occupied, see Bindemann, Scheepers, & Burton, 2009;Fletcher-Watson, Findlay, Leekam, & Benson, 2008) AOIs in order to deal with the unequal sizes of the AOIs. These results were identical to the non-normalised data.…”
Section: Eye-tracking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EEG recording was prepared while the infant was sitting on his/her caregiver's lap. For the recording, an elastic cap was used, in which 27 AgAgCl electrodes were mounted according to the [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] system. The Cz electrode was used as a reference during recording.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the N170 latency was shortest overall at nose and nasion fixation locations, an effect that might reflect most efficient holistic processing around the face center of gravity (e.g. Bindemann et al, 2009) where all facial features can be best captured.…”
Section: Inhibition Of Foveated Features By Perifoveal Features Ensurmentioning
confidence: 96%