2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icse.2015.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Views on Internal and External Validity in Empirical Software Engineering

Abstract: Abstract-Empirical methods have grown common in software engineering, but there is no consensus on how to apply them properly. Is practical relevance key? Do internally valid studies have any value? Should we replicate more to address the tradeoff between internal and external validity? We asked the community how empirical research should take place in software engineering, with a focus on the tradeoff between internal and external validity and replication, complemented with a literature review about the statu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is called external validity which is used to test the generalizability of the model across different software applications [3]. All the models show the similar result as Mozilla Firefox.…”
Section: External Validitysupporting
confidence: 50%
“…This is called external validity which is used to test the generalizability of the model across different software applications [3]. All the models show the similar result as Mozilla Firefox.…”
Section: External Validitysupporting
confidence: 50%
“…By conducting controlled experiments, the feasibility of using the TTV KB is verified. With a focus on the tradeoff between internal validity, external validity and replication, Siegmund et al asked the community how empirical research should take place in software engineering and complemented with a literature review [10]. They found that the opinions differ considerably, and that there is no consensus in the community when to focus on internal or external validity and how to conduct and review replications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For K aRCI both U PCC and ∆ω G1 are influenced. As a matter of fact, it human testing [22] so that appropriate guidelines are valuable for the CPES community.…”
Section: B Screening Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%