Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
ResumoLianas interagem de forma negativa com as árvores, uma vez que aumentam suas taxas de mortalidade. Seria esperado, portanto, que árvores apresentassem possíveis caracteres que as defenderiam contra lianas. O objetivo desse estudo foi testar se os seguintes caracteres das árvores limitam sua infestação por lianas: 1) baixa altura; 2) tronco com ramificações altas (fuste alto); 3) casca lisa; 4) casca esfoliante, e 5) menor índice de iluminação da copa. O estudo foi realizado em um fragmento de Floresta Estacional Semidecídua no município de Alfenas (MG) no qual foi amostrado em 0,1 ha, todas as árvores com diâmetro na altura do peito maior do que 3 cm. Para cada árvore registrou-se os caracteres citados anteriormente, bem como foi estimada a porcentagem de cobertura de lianas na copa. Encontrou-se que quanto maior a altura e o índice de iluminação da copa, maior a sua ocupação por lianas. Essas árvores, apesar de atingirem o dossel da floresta e, portanto, adquirirem mais luz para crescimento e reprodução, estão também mais sujeitas à ocupação por lianas. Apesar disso, supõe-se que as árvores não investem em estruturas que poderiam diminuir a ocupação por lianas, provavelmente porque a competição com outras plantas da vizinhança pode ser também intensa. Palavras-chave: competição, comunidade vegetal, Floresta Estacional Semidecídua, trepadeira. AbstractLianas (woody climbers) interact negatively with trees, increasing their mortality rates. We expect, therefore, that trees have developed supposed traits that would defend them against lianas. The aim of this paper was test if these tree traits limit their liana occupation: 1) smaller height; 2) taller free bole height; 3) smooth bark; 4) exfoliating bark, and 5) low crown illumination. This study was carried out in a fragment of a seasonal semideciduous forest in Alfenas (Minas Gerais; Southeastern Brasil). We sampled in 0.1 ha all trees with diameter at breast height larger than 3 cm. For each tree we noted the traits previously cited, as well as we estimated the percentage of liana occupation on the tree crowns. We found that, for taller trees and trees with higher crown illumination, the probability of a tree to carry lianas was higher. These trees, in spite of reaching the forest canopy, and, therefore, acquire more light for reproduction and growth, they are also more prone to liana occupation. In spite of that, we suppose that the trees do not invest on traits that could decrease the liana occupation, probably because the competition with neighbor's plants may also be intense.
ResumoLianas interagem de forma negativa com as árvores, uma vez que aumentam suas taxas de mortalidade. Seria esperado, portanto, que árvores apresentassem possíveis caracteres que as defenderiam contra lianas. O objetivo desse estudo foi testar se os seguintes caracteres das árvores limitam sua infestação por lianas: 1) baixa altura; 2) tronco com ramificações altas (fuste alto); 3) casca lisa; 4) casca esfoliante, e 5) menor índice de iluminação da copa. O estudo foi realizado em um fragmento de Floresta Estacional Semidecídua no município de Alfenas (MG) no qual foi amostrado em 0,1 ha, todas as árvores com diâmetro na altura do peito maior do que 3 cm. Para cada árvore registrou-se os caracteres citados anteriormente, bem como foi estimada a porcentagem de cobertura de lianas na copa. Encontrou-se que quanto maior a altura e o índice de iluminação da copa, maior a sua ocupação por lianas. Essas árvores, apesar de atingirem o dossel da floresta e, portanto, adquirirem mais luz para crescimento e reprodução, estão também mais sujeitas à ocupação por lianas. Apesar disso, supõe-se que as árvores não investem em estruturas que poderiam diminuir a ocupação por lianas, provavelmente porque a competição com outras plantas da vizinhança pode ser também intensa. Palavras-chave: competição, comunidade vegetal, Floresta Estacional Semidecídua, trepadeira. AbstractLianas (woody climbers) interact negatively with trees, increasing their mortality rates. We expect, therefore, that trees have developed supposed traits that would defend them against lianas. The aim of this paper was test if these tree traits limit their liana occupation: 1) smaller height; 2) taller free bole height; 3) smooth bark; 4) exfoliating bark, and 5) low crown illumination. This study was carried out in a fragment of a seasonal semideciduous forest in Alfenas (Minas Gerais; Southeastern Brasil). We sampled in 0.1 ha all trees with diameter at breast height larger than 3 cm. For each tree we noted the traits previously cited, as well as we estimated the percentage of liana occupation on the tree crowns. We found that, for taller trees and trees with higher crown illumination, the probability of a tree to carry lianas was higher. These trees, in spite of reaching the forest canopy, and, therefore, acquire more light for reproduction and growth, they are also more prone to liana occupation. In spite of that, we suppose that the trees do not invest on traits that could decrease the liana occupation, probably because the competition with neighbor's plants may also be intense.
116 Patterns of liana succession in tropical forests OVERVIEWLianas are particularly abundant in tropical forests and understanding the relationship between lianas and disturbance is a key step in understanding the dynamism and resilience of tropical forests systems. Lianas contribute only a small amount of the biomass in most forests, but they have disproportionate impacts on forest dynamics due to their competitive abilities and their capacity to alter forest structure. Despite the importance of lianas, our understanding of how the liana community responds to small-scale and large-scale disturbances lags behind our understanding of tree community responses.This chapter summarizes current research on liana succession and suggests directions for future study. In response to the small-scale disturbances caused by treefall gaps, lianas rapidly colonize space and can inhibit the establishment of shade-tolerant trees, altering the successional trajectory of forest patches. After large-scale land clearing and forest regrowth, lianas respond differently than do trees: liana biomass recovers to pre-disturbance levels more slowly than tree biomass, and liana species richness stays the same or declines over time in contrast to the increased species richness observed in the tree community.The extent to which lianas compete with trees and alter trajectories of secondary succession is largely unknown. The species composition of the liana community undergoes shifts during succession, and the traits of lianas that are prevalent at different points in succession suggest that lianas, like trees, occupy a continuum from small-seeded, light-demanding, fast-growing pioneer species to larger-seeded, shade-tolerant, slower-growing species characteristic of mature forest. Early successional lianas frequently have seedlings that lack a selfsupporting phase, while late successional lianas have freestanding seedlings and saplings.To fully appreciate the role of lianas during succession, comparative studies are needed from more ecoregions, particularly tropical dry forests where lianas tend to be abundant. Manipulative experiments and long-term demographic studies will also shed light on the ecology of lianas during succession. Trait-based approaches will permit a more nuanced understanding of lianas' responses to environmental variation and their impacts on trees. The conservation and appropriate management of tropical forests depend on understanding their dynamics, in which the liana community plays a vitally important role.
Closed‐canopy forests are being rapidly fragmented across much of the tropical world. Determining the impacts of fragmentation on ecological processes enables better forest management and improves species‐conservation outcomes. Lianas are an integral part of tropical forests but can have detrimental and potentially complex interactions with their host trees. These effects can include reduced tree growth and fecundity, elevated tree mortality, alterations in tree‐species composition, degradation of forest succession, and a substantial decline in forest carbon storage. We examined the individual impacts of fragmentation and edge effects (0–100‐m transect from edge to forest interior) on the liana community and liana–host tree interactions in rainforests of the Atherton Tableland in north Queensland, Australia. We compared the liana and tree community, the traits of liana‐infested trees, and determinants of the rates of tree infestation within five forest fragments (23–58 ha in area) and five nearby intact‐forest sites. Fragmented forests experienced considerable disturbance‐induced degradation at their edges, resulting in a significant increase in liana abundance. This effect penetrated to significantly greater depths in forest fragments than in intact forests. The composition of the liana community in terms of climbing guilds was significantly different between fragmented and intact forests, likely because forest edges had more small‐sized trees favoring particular liana guilds which preferentially use these for climbing trellises. Sites that had higher liana abundances also exhibited higher infestation rates of trees, as did sites with the largest lianas. However, large lianas were associated with low‐disturbance forest sites. Our study shows that edge disturbance of forest fragments significantly altered the abundance and community composition of lianas and their ecological relationships with trees, with liana impacts on trees being elevated in fragments relative to intact forests. Consequently, effective control of lianas in forest fragments requires management practices which directly focus on minimizing forest edge disturbance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.