VIP-WAVE: On the Feasibility of IP Communications in 802.11p Vehicular Networks

Céspedes, Sandra; Liu, Ning; Shen, Xuemin

doi:10.1109/tits.2012.2206387

Cited by 48 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Range Extending Vehicles (REV) play the role of relays towards the infrastructure or IVs; eventually, a Leaf Vehicle (LV) at the end of the chain would have access to the infrastructure. This is a generalization of the pattern proposed in the VANET literature through different terms, relaying being more frequent [8] [19] [22] [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…To that end, the protocol stacks proposed by standardization bodies (IEEE, ETSI, ISO) include mandatory IPv6 support. From a networking standpoint, the connectivity problem of end-to-end IP-based applications is usually addressed by the use of Mobile IPv6 with NEtwork MObility extension (MIPv6/NEMO), in particular for V2I communications [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analyzing dynamic IPv6 address auto-configuration techniques for group IP-based vehicular communications

Imadali¹,

Petrescu²

2014

39th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dynamic IPv6 addressing and routing configuration in vehicular networks is an important challenge that has attracted a fair amount of attention recently. Early proposals adapted fixed-infrastructure and MANET models and thus inherited their latency and overhead. Later, researchers relaxed some of the often restrictive assumptions (e.g., Router Advertisement TTL extension) but still focused on certain limited scenarios. Very recently, in the wake of the emerging concept of Future Internet, a general questioning arose on whether one naming and addressing model suits every network topology. Along this line of research, the present article poses the terms of this problem in the IP-based vehicular communications area and aims at giving one solution space instance based on the Vehicle Identification Numbers (VIN) namespace. This article advances the state-of-the-art as follows: (1) It presents a comprehensive and detailed tutorial of the main dynamic IPv6 auto-configuration approaches.(2) It gives the specifics of Future Internet paradigm as applied to vehicular networking and presents a novel approach for group and infrastructure communications based on VIN namespace. (3) It offers a comprehensive feature and analytical comparison to evaluate the proposals that fit best our communication paradigm.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing dynamic IPv6 address auto-configuration techniques for group IP-based vehicular communications

Imadali¹,

Petrescu²

2014

39th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks Workshops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this way, the front MR can perform the pre-handoff procedure to reduce the handoff delay of the rear MR. A similar scheme also was introduced in [34], in which vehicles are grouped into clusters and the cluster head is selected as an MR to maintain the IP mobility for other vehicles. Different from the aforementioned schemes, which are based on a generic IEEE 802.11 network for V2I, a recent study in [36] proposed a Vehicular IP in WAVE (VIP-WAVE) framework that defines the IP configuration for extended and non-extended IP services, and a mobility management scheme supported by Proxy Mobile IPv6 over WAVE. With this framework, it has been shown that the QoS of WAVE/IEEE 802.11p can also be improved by the signaling and movement detection mechanisms.…”

Section: ) Vanet Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Platoon-Based Vehicular Cyber-Physical Systems

Jia

Wang

et al. 2016

IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials

Self Cite

664

273

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Vehicles on the road with some common interests can cooperatively form a platoon-based driving pattern, in which a vehicle follows another one and maintains a small and nearly constant distance to the preceding vehicle. It has been proved that, compared to driving individually, such a platoon-based driving pattern can significantly improve the road capacity and energy efficiency. Moreover, with the emerging vehicular adhoc network (VANET), the performance of platoon in terms of road capacity, safety and energy efficiency, etc., can be further improved. On the other hand, the physical dynamics of vehicles inside the platoon can also affect the performance of VANET. Such a complex system can be considered as a platoon-based vehicular cyber-physical system (VCPS), which has attracted significant attention recently. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey on platoon-based VCPS. We first review the related work of platoon-based VCPS. We then introduce two elementary techniques involved in platoon-based VCPS: the vehicular networking architecture and standards, and traffic dynamics, respectively. We further discuss the fundamental issues in platoon-based VCPS, including vehicle platooning/clustering, cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC), platoon-based vehicular communications, etc., and all of which are characterized by the tight coupled relationship between traffic dynamics and VANET behaviors. Since system verification is critical to VCPS development, we also give an overview of VCPS simulation tools. Finally, we share our view on some open issues that may lead to new research directions.Index Terms-Platoon, Cyber-physical system (CPS), Vehicular ad-hoc network (VANET), Platoon-based vehicular communications, Cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC), Simulator.

show abstract

“…deployed along roadsides). The combination of intelligent transportation systems and vehicular networking presents a variety of new services such as: a) improvement of passenger and road safety [1], b) traffic management [2], c) monitoring and road surveillance [3], d ) hot-spot guidance [4], e) on-thefly broadband Internet access [5], f ) remote region connectivity [6], g) information sharing and dissemination [7], h) peer-to-peer services [8], and so forth.…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%