2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08197-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual clinical trial to compare cancer detection using combinations of 2D mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic 2D imaging

Abstract: Objectives This study was designed to compare the detection of subtle lesions (calcification clusters or masses) when using the combination of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and synthetic mammography (SM) with digital mammography (DM) alone or combined with DBT. Methods A set of 166 cases without cancer was acquired on a DBT mammography system. Realistic subtle calcification clusters and masses in the DM images and DBT planes were digitally inserted into 104 of the acquired cases. Three study arms were cre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight of the polynomials is concentrated within a Gaussian envelope with spread σu${\sigma _u}$, where au2=0.33em2πσu2$a_u^2 = \ 2\pi {\sigma _u}^2$. In this study, we used au${a_u}$ values of 15, 20, and 21, for each image reconstructed ROI sizes of 11 mm, 2 14 mm, 2 and 15 mm 2 (10‐bit depth). These parameters were selected based on values previously reported on the literature 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The weight of the polynomials is concentrated within a Gaussian envelope with spread σu${\sigma _u}$, where au2=0.33em2πσu2$a_u^2 = \ 2\pi {\sigma _u}^2$. In this study, we used au${a_u}$ values of 15, 20, and 21, for each image reconstructed ROI sizes of 11 mm, 2 14 mm, 2 and 15 mm 2 (10‐bit depth). These parameters were selected based on values previously reported on the literature 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtual clinical trials (VCTs) have been widely used as a rapid and cost‐effective alternative for evaluating and optimizing imaging technologies 1–5 . VCTs allow for the simulation of images with voxel‐wise ground‐truth, which is not available in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12,13 These types of study have their own individual strengths and weaknesses but they have in common the ability to test the effect of different imaging parameters, breast and cancer types without additional risk to women, and have the potential to investigate the effectiveness of imaging techniques, such as 2D imaging, DBT, and DBT with synthetic 2D. 10,14 In this study, we have used a four-alternative forced choice (AFC) experiment to estimate the threshold diameters of masses and calcifications to investigate the effectiveness of imaging techniques, such as 2D imaging, DBT, and DBT with synthetic 2D. There are many studies using AFC to examine the effect of different imaging technologies, but there are challenges to compare results as they depend on the system being tested, the phantom type, 12 the detector type, choice of threshold, material or attenuation coefficient of lesions, the tomosynthesis acquisition method, and the reconstruction and processing software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VCTs have been undertaken using a number of methods by adapting clinical images, 11 imaging physical phantoms, or entirely simulating breasts 12,13 . These types of study have their own individual strengths and weaknesses but they have in common the ability to test the effect of different imaging parameters, breast and cancer types without additional risk to women, and have the potential to investigate the effectiveness of imaging techniques, such as 2D imaging, DBT, and DBT with synthetic 2D 10,14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%