2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10092-019-0338-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual enriching operators

Abstract: We construct bounded linear operators that map H 1 conforming Lagrange finite element spaces to H 2 conforming virtual element spaces in two and three dimensions. These operators are useful for the analysis of nonstandard finite element methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis hinges on the following Lemma, which shows that the jump seminorm |•| , defined in (3.5) controls the distance of functions from 2 (Ω) ∩ 1 0 (Ω). See also [53] for related results that are explicit in the polynomial degree on more general meshes, and see also the concluding remarks in [10].…”
Section: A Posteriori Error Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis hinges on the following Lemma, which shows that the jump seminorm |•| , defined in (3.5) controls the distance of functions from 2 (Ω) ∩ 1 0 (Ω). See also [53] for related results that are explicit in the polynomial degree on more general meshes, and see also the concluding remarks in [10].…”
Section: A Posteriori Error Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.5 (A comment on conforming error e c ). It is possible to derive an error estimate by splitting the error using an averaging operator to C 1 -conforming macro element or virtual element spaces, as in [16,17,27]. However, such an estimate for the nonconforming part of the estimator requires using L ∞ to L 2 norm polynomial inverse inequalities several times.…”
Section: Lemma 42 (Helmholtz Decomposition)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach, recently proposed in [35] in the context of nonlinear PDEs in nondivergence form, is to reconstruct the solution into C 1 -conforming spaces introduced in [17,45]. While this allows us to avoid problems with element geometries, it introduces the disadvantage in the current context that the resulting error estimate would gain an additional suboptimality of order p d in d spatial dimensions, due to the repeated application of a polynomial inverse estimate apparently necessary for the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proof of (29) in the two-dimensional case can be found in [34,Section 4.11.3], [35, Equation (2.9)] for the case p = 2 and in [36, Lemma 3.1] for p ≥ 2. For the three-dimensional case we refer to [30], where a 3D HCT element for polynomial degrees p ∈ {2, 3} is studied and to [37], where a different function space based on virtual elements of arbitrary order is used.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is due to the fact that ∇ 2 h u h ∈  DG h (R × ) holds. The discrete Miranda-Talenti estimates follow after inserting (34) and (36) in case of H = H CG , or (35) and (37) in case of H = H DG , into (33), and combining the resulting estimates with (30) and (31). ▪…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%