GASTROINTESTINAL IMAGING R ecently, virtual noncontrast (VNC) imaging with dual-energy CT has emerged as a potential surrogate for true noncontrast (TNC) imaging in the abdomen (1). VNC imaging has proven to be beneficial for the detection of gastrointestinal bleeding (2), liver fat quantification (3), and characterization of adrenal (4,5) or renal (6-8) lesions. Moreover, VNC imaging allows for radiation dose reduction by obviating a TNC scan (6,9). However, concerns about inaccurate attenuation values in VNC images derived from dual-energy energyintegrating detector (EID) CT, and workflow issues (eg, the need for prospective protocolling), have arguably prevented its widespread adoption into routine clinical practice (7,(10)(11)(12).The introduction of whole-body, full field-of-view, dual-source photon-counting detector (PCD) CT into clinical routine heralds a new era in multienergy CT (13).Prototype PCD CT has shown a greater contrast-to-noise ratio, improved spatial resolution, and lower electronic noise compared with EID CT (13-23). Notably, the detection and resolution of photons based on their energies with PCD CT inherently allow for energy thresholding and subsequent spectral separation with every scan (24-26). Thus, VNC images can always be reconstructed after scanning, simplifying workflow in case of incidental findings. However, to be applicable in clinical routine, reliable CT attenuation values and image quality of VNC images are mandatory. The assessment of VNC images derived from PCD CT has not previously been well established in the literature.Therefore, the purpose of our study was to assess the attenuation accuracy and image quality of VNC images from abdominal PCD CT compared with TNC images in a patient sample and a phantom. Background: Accurate CT attenuation and diagnostic quality of virtual noncontrast (VNC) images acquired with photon-counting detector (PCD) CT are needed to replace true noncontrast (TNC) scans. Purpose: To assess the attenuation errors and image quality of VNC images from abdominal PCD CT compared with TNC images.
Materials and Methods:In this retrospective study, consecutive adult patients who underwent a triphasic examination with PCD CT from July 2021 to October 2021 were included. VNC images were reconstructed from arterial and portal venous phase CT. The absolute attenuation error of VNC compared with TNC images was measured in multiple structures by two readers. Then, two readers blinded to image reconstruction assessed the overall image quality, image noise, noise texture, and delineation of small structures using five-point discrete visual scales (5 = excellent, 1 = nondiagnostic). Overall image quality greater than or equal to 3 was deemed diagnostic. In a phantom, noise texture, spatial resolution, and detectability index were assessed. A detectability index greater than or equal to 5 indicated high diagnostic accuracy. Interreader agreement was evaluated using the Krippendorff a coefficient. The paired t test and Friedman test were applied to compare objective...