2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual planning in orthognathic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
125
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
125
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining the clinical examinations and 3D cephalometric analysis of the virtual model, the diagnosis of the maxillofacial deformity was carried out, checking the occlusion, bipupillary lines, maxilloemandibular contour angle, mandibular sulcus contour angle, the soft tissue angles, and dental exposure during smile. 26 The diagnosis using a 3D model can be shown to patients for better understanding. A preliminary plan is developed by combining the conventional planning and 3D digital model.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining the clinical examinations and 3D cephalometric analysis of the virtual model, the diagnosis of the maxillofacial deformity was carried out, checking the occlusion, bipupillary lines, maxilloemandibular contour angle, mandibular sulcus contour angle, the soft tissue angles, and dental exposure during smile. 26 The diagnosis using a 3D model can be shown to patients for better understanding. A preliminary plan is developed by combining the conventional planning and 3D digital model.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] A previously performed systematic review of the literature found only seven clinical trials validating the virtual surgical planning protocol in orthognathic surgery. 12 A recent study by Zinser et al 13 compared accuracy and precision between conventional planning, navigationassisted placement, and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) surgical positioning splints. All studies focused on bimaxillary procedures; only three included genioplasty, and none included segmentation of the maxilla.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these bimaxillary full‐anatomic splints can be fabricated with a minimum thickness layer of 0.3 mm in both jaws separately, enabling clinicians to verify the final functional result with any possible fine adjustments needed, allowing for good patient compliance . In intricate cases involving craniomaxillofacial anomalies, often together with necessary orofacial surgeries or prosthetic treatments due to moderate to severe tooth wear, such digital preprosthetic treatment and planning options represent an important enhancement …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%