2016
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2016.2548978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Signal Injection Based Direct Flux Vector Control of IPMSM Drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These MTPA control schemes are independent of machine parameters but need to inject perturbations into [21]- [23]. Since the virtual signal injection control scheme does not inject any real signal into motor, therefore, the additional power losses, increased current/voltage harmonics and the resonant problems associated with the real signal injection are inherently avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These MTPA control schemes are independent of machine parameters but need to inject perturbations into [21]- [23]. Since the virtual signal injection control scheme does not inject any real signal into motor, therefore, the additional power losses, increased current/voltage harmonics and the resonant problems associated with the real signal injection are inherently avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permanent magnet (PM) machines have increasingly been employed in a variety of applications ranging from automotive, aerospace and industrial automation to renewable power generation [1], [2]. In many these applications, PM machines often have to operate under transient conditions that can vary significantly in terms of cooling, ambient temperature, and power/torque output [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal reference flux amplitude can be generated through mathematical model [12] or pre-defined look-up tables which are obtained from experiments or numerical machine model [13]. However, the f-t frame based MTPA control schemes are affected not only by the errors in the reference flux amplitude due to the machine parameter uncertainty and nonlinearity [6], but also by the flux observer errors in the flux control loop [14]. Thus, compared with d-q frame based MTPA control schemes, f-t frame based control schemes are vulnerable to flux errors in the reference and observer [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the problems associate with the f-t frame based control methods described previously, a novel concept that utilizes d-q frame based searching techniques to compensate the MTPA control errors of the f-t frame based control schemes was proposed in [14]. This control scheme utilizes the virtual signal injection to track the MTPA points in the f-t frame and is robust to flux observer error and motor parameters inaccuracy in tracking MTPA points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%