1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01493-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virus resistance and gene silencing: killing the messenger

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the PTGS process, once a specific mRNA enters the cytoplasm, it is recognized by the RNA surveillance system and degraded. This phenomenon is observed in different organisms including plants, animals, and fungi (Waterhouse, 1999;Sijen and Kooter, 2000). When transgenic plants become infected with the virus that expresses the same sequence as the transgene, the mRNA, viral RNA, and transgene mRNA are degraded (Vaucheret and Fagard, 2001).…”
Section: Analysis Of Resistance To Plrv Infection In Transgenic Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the PTGS process, once a specific mRNA enters the cytoplasm, it is recognized by the RNA surveillance system and degraded. This phenomenon is observed in different organisms including plants, animals, and fungi (Waterhouse, 1999;Sijen and Kooter, 2000). When transgenic plants become infected with the virus that expresses the same sequence as the transgene, the mRNA, viral RNA, and transgene mRNA are degraded (Vaucheret and Fagard, 2001).…”
Section: Analysis Of Resistance To Plrv Infection In Transgenic Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independence of RNA truncation on DNA methylation observed in this study is consistent with our previous finding that GUS gene silencing by a dsRNAencoding inverted-repeat transgene is associated with increased DNA methylation in the GUS sequence but is not reversed by demethylation treatment (Wang & Waterhouse, 2000)+ In both cases, the hypermethylation appears to be a footprint of dsRNA-mediated PTGS, but does not contribute to the reduction in RNA levels+ This suggests that, although PTGS and RdDM are likely to be induced by the same dsRNA, they may have distinct biological roles+ It has been suggested that PTGS is a natural mechanism developed by plants to fight against viral infection (Covey et al+, 1997;Kooter et al+, 1999;Waterhouse et al+, 1999)+ DNA methylation, on the other hand, has been suggested to play a role in plant defense against selfish DNA (i+e+, transposon elements) by silencing the transposons through methylation-induced chromatin condensation (Ashraf & Ip, 1998;Kooter et al+, 1999)+ It has been recently found that, in Caenorhabditis elegans, mutations of several genes involved in RNAi can cause reactivation of transposons (Tabara et al+, 1999)+ This indicates that dsRNA is involved in both RNA degradation and transposon silencing+ Our result suggests that this may also be the case in plants; dsRNA confers viral resistance by triggering PTGS against viral RNA, while it can silence the transposons by inducing RdDM in the target sequences+…”
Section: The Biological Role Of Rddmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PTGS is triggered efficiently by dsRNA intermediates of cytoplasmically replicating viruses. The RNA genome of the invading virus is targeted and eliminated specifically when this natural antiviral mechanism is activated (Waterhouse et al, 1998(Waterhouse et al, , 1999Baulcombe, 1999;Smith et al, 2000;. In higher plants, PTGS is not limited to the cells in which it is activated, because mobile signals produced by PTGS can spread and confer sequence-specific RNA degradation in distant tissues (Palauqui et al, 1997;Voinnet and Baulcombe, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%