2013
DOI: 10.1122/1.4774325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscometric functions for noncolloidal sphere suspensions with Newtonian matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
59
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
16
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Later measurements by Singh & Nott (2003) using similar devices have confirmed that N 1 and N 2 are both negative but with a ratio N 2 /N 1 which depends on φ. Dai et al (2013) used a combination of a parallelplate rheometer and the open semi-circular trough method to measure N 1 and N 2 .T h e y found a good agreement with previous works with negative normal stress differences and |N 1 |⌧| N 2 |. Those three studies measured negative normal stress differences with |N 1 | smaller than |N 2 |.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Later measurements by Singh & Nott (2003) using similar devices have confirmed that N 1 and N 2 are both negative but with a ratio N 2 /N 1 which depends on φ. Dai et al (2013) used a combination of a parallelplate rheometer and the open semi-circular trough method to measure N 1 and N 2 .T h e y found a good agreement with previous works with negative normal stress differences and |N 1 |⌧| N 2 |. Those three studies measured negative normal stress differences with |N 1 | smaller than |N 2 |.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Future works shall also consider in more details the issue of normal stresses. Indeed, another important non-Newtonian rheological feature exhibited by non-colloidal suspensions is the development of normal stress differences in simple shear flow, with negative values of N 2 , an ongoing debate concerning the sign of N 1 , and a ratio |N 2 /N 1 | on the order of three, typically [4,[50][51][52][53]. In agreement with experimental observations, our model effectively predicts that microstructure anisotropy is associated to the existence of normal stresses proportional to shear rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Output results depend uniquely on the physical model adopted for the solvent medium (a Newtonian inertia-less fluid in that case) and not on hidden details of the numerical implementation. As a matter of fact, converged rheological results for the suspension viscosity have been achieved in excellent agreement with previous results obtained by alternative techniques (i.e., Stokesian dynamics) [89] and experiments [88] . The fact that the obtained flow behavior is "numerically converged" and it uniquely relies on the physical model adopted with no tuning parameters (such as effective particle hydrodynamic radius, effective rigid-core radius, and effective bulk viscosity/solid volume fraction), precisely allows the technique to be predictive, as opposite to descriptive, i.e., being able to reproduce complex fluid rheology.…”
Section: How Is the Fluid Complexity Incorporated In Sdpd?supporting
confidence: 78%