2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscosity Measurements Using Microfluidic Droplet Length

Abstract: Viscosity measurements have a wide range of applications from industrial chemical production to medical diagnosis. In this work, we have developed a simple droplet-based, water-in-oil continuous viscometer capable of measuring viscosity changes in 10 s or less and consuming a total sample volume of less than 1 μL/h. The viscometer employs a flow-focusing geometry and generates droplets under constant pressure. The length of the droplets (L) is highly correlated to the aqueous-phase viscosity (μ) at high ratios… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, various devices such as a microelectromechanical system (MEMS)-based microfluidic device, a 3D-printed microfluidic device [13,24], and a paper-based device [25] have been suggested for inducing blood flow in a specifically constrained direction. Third, quantification techniques such as advancing meniscus (i.e., variations of a blood column over time) [15,22,26,27], the falling time of a metal sphere in a tube [28], electric impedances (i.e., resistance, capacitance) [29,30], droplet length [31], digital flow compartment with a microfluidic channel array [11,12], interface detection in co-flowing streams [32,33], and reversal flow switching in a Wheatstone bridge analog of a fluidic circuit [14] have been suggested to measure blood viscosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, various devices such as a microelectromechanical system (MEMS)-based microfluidic device, a 3D-printed microfluidic device [13,24], and a paper-based device [25] have been suggested for inducing blood flow in a specifically constrained direction. Third, quantification techniques such as advancing meniscus (i.e., variations of a blood column over time) [15,22,26,27], the falling time of a metal sphere in a tube [28], electric impedances (i.e., resistance, capacitance) [29,30], droplet length [31], digital flow compartment with a microfluidic channel array [11,12], interface detection in co-flowing streams [32,33], and reversal flow switching in a Wheatstone bridge analog of a fluidic circuit [14] have been suggested to measure blood viscosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the pressure‐driven device, even though the flow‐rate fluctuations coming from the pump source can be drastically reduced, according to the literature, it is still very important and difficult to precisely control the flow rates of the fluids for the pressure‐driven flows. Especially for the droplet microfluidics , as the droplet size is quite sensitive to the variation of the flow rates supplied by the pressure‐driven device, how to accurately control the flow rates of the fluids is of great importance for improving the stability and uniformity of droplet production . In addition to droplet formation, there are various applications of droplet microfluidcs which require high stability and accuracy of the microfluidic flows, especially some flow regulator and stabilizer are designed to improve the stablility of the flow‐rate supply .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, Livak-Dahl et al [ 20 ] has calculated the droplet viscosity using an abrupt channel constriction, which has been characterised by a high hydrodynamic resistance, compared to the whole microfluidic system. A different solution has been proposed by Li et al [ 21 ]. The authors took advantage of a relationship between the viscosity and the length of the generated droplets in a flow-focusing microfluidic junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%