2015
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscous–poroelastic interaction as mechanism to create adhesion in frogs’ toe pads

Abstract: The toe pads of frogs consist of soft hexagonal structures and a viscous liquid contained between and within the hexagonal structures. It has been hypothesized that this configuration creates adhesion by allowing for long-range capillary forces, or, alternatively, by allowing for exit of the liquid and thus improving contact of the toe pad. In this work, we suggest interaction between viscosity and elasticity as a mechanism to create temporary adhesion, even in the absence of capillary effects or van der Waals… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 does not hold anymore, particularly with an increasing sliding distance. Alternatively, viscous-poroelastic effects have been proposed to contribute to tree frog attachment [ 93 ].…”
Section: Basic Theory Of Potential Attachment Mechanisms In a Toe Padmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 does not hold anymore, particularly with an increasing sliding distance. Alternatively, viscous-poroelastic effects have been proposed to contribute to tree frog attachment [ 93 ].…”
Section: Basic Theory Of Potential Attachment Mechanisms In a Toe Padmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duchemin & Vandenberghe (2014) examined the dynamics due to impact of a rigid body on a thin elastic sheet laying over a liquid. Tulchinsky & Gat (2015) studied externally forced deformation of a saturated poroelastic medium laying on rough wet surface in the context of adhesion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the quest for functional structures inspired by nature raised great interest in the relation between function (e.g., light harvesting, impact‐resistance, adhesion) and properties (e.g., strength, toughness, stiffness) by means of varying structural rather than material properties . Indeed, to meet the natural equilibrium between material formation and degradation, biological materials are limited in both number and performance (e.g., natural materials are typically soft or brittle), and exceptional properties originate from geometric complexity, rather than from the used materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%