2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visibility of weak contrasts in subsurface scattering near-field microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10][11][12] Increasing the working distance of such a system is a key limitation for subsurface imaging. 13 One approach is a superlens 14 that uses negative refraction to achieve, in principle, a perfect imaging system that retains all wave vectors of the source. Another related approach is evanescent wave amplification, where planar structures induce convergence in the near field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] Increasing the working distance of such a system is a key limitation for subsurface imaging. 13 One approach is a superlens 14 that uses negative refraction to achieve, in principle, a perfect imaging system that retains all wave vectors of the source. Another related approach is evanescent wave amplification, where planar structures induce convergence in the near field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples have been investigated by evaluating the optical amplitude s 2 images of the second demodulation order (unless otherwise stated), in order to have the background suppressed while on the other hand having sufficient overall signal strength. The SNOM images were acquired with a tapping amplitude of 60 nm as a compromise between mechanical stability, high contrast and low noise [19]. A pixel size of 20 nm and a sampling time of 30 ms/pixel have been chosen.…”
Section: Snom Imaging Of Nanoparticles Buried Below a Dielectricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We image small metallic nanoparticles below a Si 3 N 4 -membrane and vary membrane thickness and particle size. In order to be comparable with the previous reported results [18,19], we first choose a wavenumber for imaging and modelling where the permittivity of the cover layer is positive. TEM imaging enables a correct attribution between structure size and the corresponding optical signals, which in turn are compared with a simple model calculation yielding quite good agreement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations