2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vision modulation, plasticity and restoration using non-invasive brain stimulation – An IFCN-sponsored review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 281 publications
0
41
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-invasive visual cortex stimulation studies have reported varying fellow eye effects. Studies using inhibitory stimulation protocols (1 Hz rTMS and continuous theta burst stimulation; cTBS) have reported reduced fellow eye contrast sensitivity [35,36] whereas those using excitatory protocols (anodal tDCS and tRNS) [24,40], including the present study, observed improvements. This pattern of results is consistent with the homeostasis hypothesis which predicts relatively impaired fellow eye function following inhibitory stimulation and does not rule out improved fellow eye function following excitatory stimulation.…”
Section: Trns-induced Improvements In Contrast Sensitivitycontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Non-invasive visual cortex stimulation studies have reported varying fellow eye effects. Studies using inhibitory stimulation protocols (1 Hz rTMS and continuous theta burst stimulation; cTBS) have reported reduced fellow eye contrast sensitivity [35,36] whereas those using excitatory protocols (anodal tDCS and tRNS) [24,40], including the present study, observed improvements. This pattern of results is consistent with the homeostasis hypothesis which predicts relatively impaired fellow eye function following inhibitory stimulation and does not rule out improved fellow eye function following excitatory stimulation.…”
Section: Trns-induced Improvements In Contrast Sensitivitycontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…A previous study [36] reporting improved amblyopic eye contrast sensitivity following both excitatory and inhibitory visual cortex rTMS proposed a mechanism linked to cortical homeostasis. According to this hypothesis, excitatory stimulation has a more pronounced effect on weakly activated/suppressed neural populations whereas inhibitory stimulation has a greater effect on strongly activated populations.…”
Section: Trns-induced Improvements In Contrast Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results in this study imply that network functionality poses no limit to future treatment options. The central role of the LIG suggests that future therapies, such as brain stimulation, could focus on this brain area, as its modulation may benefit glaucoma patients (Sabel et al, 2020). Moreover, the notion that orientation and mobility performance are also part of this equation could support the introduction of cognition-based mobility training in the treatment (Gunn et al, 2019; Virgili & Rubin, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there is a great need to learn more about psychosocial factors affecting vision recovery and restoration to clarify causes of response variability and move toward a more effective, personalized (and possibly preventive) treatment, we now explored how personality traits impact recovery of vision. To this end, we studied the influence of age, gender, personality traits, and chronic stress levels on outcome in patients who had previously been treated with repetitive transorbital ACS treatment, a vision restoration-inducing technique [for a recent review, see 51]. Specifically, our hypothesis was that personalities prone to stress would more likely suffer from VD and would most likely benefit from ACS, a technique known to improve blood flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%