2012 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2012
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2012.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Analysis of Dynamic Networks Using Change Centrality

Abstract: Abstract-The visualization and analysis of dynamic social networks are challenging problems, demanding the simultaneous consideration of relational and temporal aspects. In order to follow the evolution of a network over time, we need to detect not only which nodes and which links change and when these changes occur, but also the impact they have on their neighbourhood and on the overall relational structure. Aiming to enhance the perception of structural changes at both the micro and the macro level, we intro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-cluster distances were calculated using the agglomerative clustering functions "linkage" with distance calculated from shared PCs using the cluster average (also known as UPGMA), and novel clusters identified using the "fcluster" function of Scipy's hierarchical clustering. In parallel, the method to calculate change centrality was calculated as described previously 69 . CCs were calculated in a successive way, in which each addition was compared to Viral RefSeq 85 independently of other additions (0% versus 10%, 0% vs 20%, […], 0% vs 100%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-cluster distances were calculated using the agglomerative clustering functions "linkage" with distance calculated from shared PCs using the cluster average (also known as UPGMA), and novel clusters identified using the "fcluster" function of Scipy's hierarchical clustering. In parallel, the method to calculate change centrality was calculated as described previously 69 . CCs were calculated in a successive way, in which each addition was compared to Viral RefSeq 85 independently of other additions (0% versus 10%, 0% vs 20%, […], 0% vs 100%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pohl et al proposed an aggregated structural metrics by measuring variation of the degree centrality [37]. To address local structural change details, Paolo et.al proposed a novel metric for dynamic networks [21], but their application is limited to a small exemplary case.…”
Section: Dynamic Network Analysis and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently created network layout compared to the previous layout for predicting similarity to the final layout. Changes in the structure defined by the chang centrality metric that enables pairwise comparisons in the evolving network [FPA+12]. They have presented a set of novel metrics for the visual analysis of dynamic networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%