2004
DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual attention modulates audiovisual speech perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
115
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
10
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the most challenging listening conditions, the LDs may have attended primarily to the visual stimuli, in spite of the instructions to report what they heard. Support for this hypothesis can be found in recent work by Tiippana et al, showing that visual attention to the lips modulates perceptions of incongruent audiovisual speech [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the most challenging listening conditions, the LDs may have attended primarily to the visual stimuli, in spite of the instructions to report what they heard. Support for this hypothesis can be found in recent work by Tiippana et al, showing that visual attention to the lips modulates perceptions of incongruent audiovisual speech [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…Other studies on audiovisual speech using this dual task have indeed found that an additional visual task (tracking a moving leaf over a speaking face) can interfere with lipreading (e.g., Tiippana, Andersen, & Sams, 2004), thus preventing any firm conclusion about whether attention affects cross-modal information integration rather than lipreading itself. A recent report on spatial attention (i.e., attending one out of two faces presented on the left and right of fixation) also confirms that endogenous attention affects lipreading rather than multisensory integration (Andersen, Tiippana, Laarni,…”
Section: -Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Nevertheless, studies with adults suggest that there can be an attentional cost to processing audio-visual fusions of this sort. Tiippana et al (2004) and Alsius et al (2005) independently showed that a visual distractor task could reduce the incidence of illusory McGurk percepts. In Tiippana et al's study, the distractor element was a moving image of a leaf randomly floating across the face of the talker (but not obscuring the mouth).…”
Section: Binding: Some Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%