1946
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1946.00890210036003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Disturbances Associated With Head Injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1949
1949
1952
1952

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are therefore justified in accepting the evidence that a partial lesion of one occipital pole will produce a scotoma reaching to the fixation point, and therefore we must conclude that the " macula " is represented strictly unilaterally. Holmes and Lister (1916) and Lister and Holmes (1916) reached the same conclusion from their experience in the first world war, as did Greear and McGavic (1946) in the second world war, and Putnam and Liebman (1942) from an extensive review of the literature. The advocates of bilateral representation of the " macula " postulate a tract from one lateral geniculate body to the opposite striate cortex crossing the midline in the corpus callosum, but Putnam and Liebman conclude that on the one hand there is no good evidence to show that such a tract exists and on the other there is a great deal of evidence that it does not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…We are therefore justified in accepting the evidence that a partial lesion of one occipital pole will produce a scotoma reaching to the fixation point, and therefore we must conclude that the " macula " is represented strictly unilaterally. Holmes and Lister (1916) and Lister and Holmes (1916) reached the same conclusion from their experience in the first world war, as did Greear and McGavic (1946) in the second world war, and Putnam and Liebman (1942) from an extensive review of the literature. The advocates of bilateral representation of the " macula " postulate a tract from one lateral geniculate body to the opposite striate cortex crossing the midline in the corpus callosum, but Putnam and Liebman conclude that on the one hand there is no good evidence to show that such a tract exists and on the other there is a great deal of evidence that it does not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%