2011
DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2011006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual inspection of products: a comparison of the methods used to evaluate surface anomalies

Abstract: Abstract. This paper presents and compares different approaches currently used to assess surface anomalies identified on a product. The common point between these methods is that they are based on a document presented in the form of a table, which is to help the inspector to assess the anomaly detected in a repeatable and reproducible way. We will present three types of table: criteria/level table, tree-like presentation table and an indexed table. As each of these tables presents certain limits when applied t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual inspection method was used to assess all anomalies which can occur on the surface of lipstick [14,29,51,86,123]. The lipstick was evaluated with the following standards: [124] "Mark": something that damages the surface, a break in the form (for example, scratches, dent, etc.) [124].…”
Section: Surface Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The visual inspection method was used to assess all anomalies which can occur on the surface of lipstick [14,29,51,86,123]. The lipstick was evaluated with the following standards: [124] "Mark": something that damages the surface, a break in the form (for example, scratches, dent, etc.) [124].…”
Section: Surface Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lipstick was evaluated with the following standards: [124] "Mark": something that damages the surface, a break in the form (for example, scratches, dent, etc.) [124]. "Heterogeneity": anything that makes the product lose homogeneity (for example, stain, difference in colour and/or texture, etc.)…”
Section: Surface Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it depends on several factors related to the modalities of the observation: the observer, the object observed, the inspection purpose and the light environment. [1][2][3] To automate appearance quality inspection, multi-lighting imaging techniques, for example Reflectance Transformation Imaging (RTI), are gaining in interest. The RTI provides access to multidimensional information (dynamic image relighting, luminance, slopes, curvatures, 3D mappings, visual saliency cartographies, etc.).…”
Section: Rti and Surface Quality Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, an anomaly-free surface does not exist since, at a given level of magnification, the controller will always detect some kind of deviation from the ideal surface [2]. This deviation is a difference in relief, in color, in shape and/or in contrast.…”
Section: Aesthetic Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%