1977
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1977.00780220081010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Interference on Vestibular Response: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean postrotatory nystagmus duration was 19 sec, with 6.9 sec SD. Similar effects have been demonstrated in normal adults (Levy et al, 1977). She reports mean values similar to those of Ayres and high test-retest reliability unaffected by time of day of testing.…”
Section: Studies Of Vestibular Function Limited To Mid-childhoodsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The mean postrotatory nystagmus duration was 19 sec, with 6.9 sec SD. Similar effects have been demonstrated in normal adults (Levy et al, 1977). She reports mean values similar to those of Ayres and high test-retest reliability unaffected by time of day of testing.…”
Section: Studies Of Vestibular Function Limited To Mid-childhoodsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Visual fixation will suppress the nystagmic response to vestibular stimulation, whether rotatory or caloric in nature (Sokilovski, 1966;Tjernstrom, 1973;Levy et al, 1977;Kato et al, 1977;Baloh et al, 1977;Karlsen et al, 1980). It is accepted, therefore, that a valid assessment of vestibular function can be obtained only when the confounding effect of visual suppression has been eliminated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weeks change across phases. Numerous factors have been found to effect PRN duration including degree of mental alertness (19), visual fixation ability (20), eye closure (21), and head position (22). It is impossible to determine why subject 2 did not respond to intervention with changes in PRN duration; however, it is interesting to note that other measures previously shown to be related to vestibular function (4) were within a normal range for this subject (see Table I).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%