Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual odometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
887
0
7

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,164 publications
(896 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
887
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a specialized term "visual SLAM" (V-SLAM in short) was coined to distinguish the SLAM systems relying mainly on cameras, which relates to the fact that the estimation of subsequent poses of the moving camera is called "visual odometry" (VO) (Nistér et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, a specialized term "visual SLAM" (V-SLAM in short) was coined to distinguish the SLAM systems relying mainly on cameras, which relates to the fact that the estimation of subsequent poses of the moving camera is called "visual odometry" (VO) (Nistér et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, it is based on matching features extracted from both current and previous images, finding parts of both images corresponding to the same scene elements. There Efficient generation of 3D surfel maps using RGB-D sensors 101 are algorithms based only on RGB image features (either for a single camera (Nistér et al, 2004) or a stereo-camera case ), but the additional depth information makes the matching process much easier. As a result, a sparse 3D cloud of features is generated, allowing robust estimation of the transformation between camera poses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the recovered trajectories directly affects the performance of attractive higher level tasks such as structure from motion [1], visual odometry [2], concurrent mapping and localization [3], and visual servoing [4]. However, the priorities of the desired tracking behaviour may differ between the particular contexts, since the former two involve larger numbers of "nameless" features, while the latter ones usually focus on fewer but more important landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two main approaches for conceiving a point feature tracker are iterative first-order differential approximation [5,6], and exhaustive matching [2,7]. In both approaches, a straightforward implementation based on integrating inter-frame motion is a viable solution only for short-term operation, due to the incontrollable growth of the accumulated drift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation