Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction 3 and 12 months after implantation of a refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens

McNeely, Richard N.; Pazo, Emmanuel Eric; Spence, Andrew J.; Richoz, Olivier; Nesbit, M. Andrew; Moore, Tara; Moore, Jonathan E.

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.025

Cited by 22 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At both postoperative assessments, the majority of patients in both groups reported excellent spectacle independency. McNeely et al [23] found that 100.0% of patients never used spectacles, which is similar to the results in our study. Moreover, a limitation of our study is absence of data on various visual disturbances and photopic phenomena, which should be evaluated in future prospective studies.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

“…SBL-3 is the second commercially available model of MIOL based on the concept of rotationally asymmetric. Several studies have shown that this MIOL provided excellent vision outcomes with a good range of functional vision [23]. e present study sought to compare the far, near, and intermediate visual acuity outcomes, defocus curve, and intraocular optical quality parameters in patients with SBL-3 and SN6AD1.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Optical Quality with a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens and an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Wang

2020

Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. To compare the short-term visual outcomes and intraocular optical performance of a rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) (SBL-3, Lenstec, Inc., Christ Church, Barbados) and an apodized diffractive MIOL (the Acrysof IQ ResTOR SN6AD1, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, United States). Methods. A prospective, comparative, nonrandomized, and single-center study. Sixty-eight age-related cataract patients (81 eyes) after phacoemulsification cataract surgery and in-the-bag MIOL implantation were enrolled. Thirty-eight eyes received SBL-3, and 43 eyes received SN6AD1. Ophthalmological evaluation included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), modulation transfer function (MTF), Strehl ratio (SR), intraocular aberrations (4 mm optical zone), and defocus curve at 3 months postoperatively. The Chinese version of the visual function index-14 (VF-12-CN) and spectacle independence were assessed in all patients. Results. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in postoperative UDVA (p=0.186). Postoperative UIVA and UNVA were significantly better for the SBL-3 group than for the SN6AD1 group (p<0.01). Statistically significant differences were revealed in defocus levels from –3.50 D to −4.00 D with better visual acuities for the SBL-3 group (p<0.01). For intraocular optical quality outcomes, statistically significant differences between groups were observed in RMS of intraocular total aberrations, coma, and trefoil high-order aberrations, presenting significantly higher values of these parameters in the eyes of the SBL-3 group (p < 0.01). Statistically significant differences were revealed in the MTF values at spatial frequencies of 5 and 10 cycles/degree between groups. There were no significant differences in scores of VF-12-CN, and spectacle independence between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusions. Both MIOLs were able to successfully restore visual function after cataract surgery. SBL-3 provided better UIVA and UNVA with a wider range of intermediate vision.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 93%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Optical Quality with a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens and an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Wang

2020

Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It has been reported that there is a period of neuroadaptation with multifocal IOLs during which visual symptoms appear to subside and overall patient satisfaction increases. 8 This is in agreement with a study by McNeely et al 9 that assessed the SBL-3 IOL 3 and 12 months postoperatively to determine overall patient satisfaction. The study found that the overall quality of vision improved from 3 to 12 months postoperatively despite no statistically significant change in objective visual or refractive outcomes.…”

Section: Conclusion: Both Refractive Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocalsupporting

confidence: 88%

Visual quality and performance comparison between 2 refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses

McNeely

Pazo

Spence

et al. 2017

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The SBL-3 has been clinically used to improve intermediate vision and reduce visual disturbances while restoring good visual outcomes at near and distance. 4 , 12 , 13 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparative study on early vision quality after implantation of refractive segmental and diffractive multifocal intraocular lens

Lian

Wei

et al. 2020

Pak J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To compare early subjective and objective vision quality of postoperative patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery combined with implantation of refractive segmental multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) SBL-3 and apodized diffractive MIOL SN6AD1. Methods: As a prospective study, it enrolled 53 patients (53 eyes) to undergo phacoemulsification cataract surgery combined with MIOL implantation. According to differences in MIOL implanted, patients were divided into a SBL-3 group (25 eyes) and a SN6AD1 group (28 eyes). Ophthalmological evaluation included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, uncorrected intermediate (UIVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuities, distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA) and near (DCNVA)visual acuities and corrected near(CNVA) visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, modulation transfer function (MTF) and high order aberration (4 mm pupil diameter) at three months postoperatively. Moreover, a questionnaire survey was carried out to assess near spectacle independence, patient satisfaction and symptoms of visual disturbance. Results: At three months after surgery, UIVA and UNVA in the SBL-3 group are statistically significantly superior to those of the SN6AD1 group (P<0.05). There was statistical difference in contrast sensitivity at four spatial frequencies (3, 6, 12, 18cycles/degree) under mesopic conditions and mesopic conditions with glare (P<0.05). The total ocular high order aberration, coma and trefoil were statistically significantly larger in the SBL-3 group than in the SN6AD1 group with 4.0 mm pupil diameters (P<0.05). Statistical differences were found in the MTF at spatial frequencies of 5, 10 and 15 cycles/degree between the groups. There were no significant differences in spectacle independence, patient satisfaction and visual disturbance between the groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Both the two multifocal intraocular lens provided an excellent level of quality of vision three months postoperatively. However, the application effect of SBL-3 MIOL is superior to that of SN6AD1 MIOL as far as intermediate vision, near vision and contrast sensitivity are concerned. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.3364 How to cite this:Lian H, Ma W, Wei Q, Yuan X. A comparative study on early vision quality after implantation of refractive segmental and diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(7):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.3364 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

show abstract

Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction 3 and 12 months after implantation of a refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens

Cited by 22 publications

References 17 publications

Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Optical Quality with a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens and an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Comparative Analysis of Visual Performance and Optical Quality with a Rotationally Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens and an Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Visual quality and performance comparison between 2 refractive rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses

A comparative study on early vision quality after implantation of refractive segmental and diffractive multifocal intraocular lens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About