“…In addition, the eagle function (Reymond and Wolfe, 1981) and the kestrel function (Hirsch, 1982) are each comprised of data from a single subject only. This paucity of data is rather surprising considering the substantial literature that exists on the optics, anatomy, physiology, and histochemistry of the eye, the retina, and the central visual system of birds (Karten, 1969;Karten et al, 1973;Shimizu, Cox, and Karten, 1995;Hodos and Erichsen, 1990;Holden, 1980;Bagnoli, 1984;Wang, Jiang, and Frost, 1993), including a number of studies that have been carried out on their visual acuity (Hodos and Leibowitz, 1976;Hodos, et al, 1991a;Gaffney and Hodos, 2003;Güntürkün and Hahmann, 1994;Hahmann and Güntürkün, 1993;Schmid and Wildsoet, 1998;Porciatti, et al, 1991;Hirsch, 1982;Reymond and Wolfe, 1981;Reymond, 1987;Martin and Gordon, 1974;Fite, 1973;Fite and RosenfieldWessels, 1975;Fox, et al, 1976;Dabrowska, 1975;Blough, 1971; Orders combined. Since a great deal of diversity is found in avian visual morphology, specialized for various econiches, it would not be surprising to find avian species that had contrast sensitivities currently considered to be in the mammalian range.…”