Visual simulation through different intraocular lenses in patients with previous myopic corneal ablation using adaptive optics: Effect of tilt and decentration

Abstract

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

In vitro optical performance of a new aberration-free intraocular lens

“…Nevertheless, the corneal profile could slightly vary within normal individuals but largely within patients that have undergone corneal refractive surgeries. [18][19][20][21] For these cases, due to the HOA profiles of the IOL are also showed and the surgeons could assess the corneal profile of each patient, it would be possible to estimate which is the best IOL to each individual case.…”

“…One of the most important factors is the required accuracy of the centration of the lens. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Decentration of an IOL can lead to other common complication: tilt. In fact, tilt and decentration of the implanted IOLs could limit or even cancel out the theoretical advantages of aspheric IOLs.…”

Implantable collamer lens and femtosecond laser for myopia: comparison using an adaptive optics visual simulator

“…The aberrations of the wet cell alone were also measured and subtracted from ICL + wet cell aberrations following previously published methods (11,16,(18)(19)(20) . Two ICL powers were analyzed: -3 D and -6 D. All measurements were repeated 10 times for each lens and computed for 3-mm and 5-mm pupil diameters.…”

In vitro optical performance of nonrotational symmetric and refractive–diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses: Impact of tilt and decentration

“…The aberrations of the wet cell alone were also measured and subtracted from the overall aberrations values following previous methodology. [7][8][9] In vitro wavefront profiles for both IOLs were obtained in 5 situations: centered, decentered 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm, and tilted 2 degrees and 4 degrees. All measurements (10 times per IOL and situation) were taken with a 5.0 mm pupil.…”