1995
DOI: 10.1093/neucas/1.2.139-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual word activation in pure alexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the masked lexical decision task, however, it seems plausible that subjects may have made accurate positive responses on many trials without being aware of the target word's identity, using instead a sense of familiarity, as suggested by the distributed memory model. Consistent with this suggestion, Bub and Arguin (1995) reported that a patient with pure alexia, who showed the characteristic pattern of laborious letter-by-letter reading when asked to identify words, achieved above-chance lexical decision accuracy when the exposure duration of targets was well below that normally required for the patient to report the word's identity. Therefore, the masked lexical decision task may have been particularly well suited for models-such as the distributed memory model-that rely on a single evaluative dimension for discriminating between words and nonwords.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In the masked lexical decision task, however, it seems plausible that subjects may have made accurate positive responses on many trials without being aware of the target word's identity, using instead a sense of familiarity, as suggested by the distributed memory model. Consistent with this suggestion, Bub and Arguin (1995) reported that a patient with pure alexia, who showed the characteristic pattern of laborious letter-by-letter reading when asked to identify words, achieved above-chance lexical decision accuracy when the exposure duration of targets was well below that normally required for the patient to report the word's identity. Therefore, the masked lexical decision task may have been particularly well suited for models-such as the distributed memory model-that rely on a single evaluative dimension for discriminating between words and nonwords.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The performance of alexic patients in those tasks do not result from letter-byletter reading, a strategy which must even be carefully prevented to allow implicit reading to emerge (Coslett, Saffran EM, Greenbaum S, & Schwartz, 1993). Accordingly, whenever word length was studied, no influence of this parameter on lexical decision was found (Bub & Arguin, 1995;Coslett & Saffran, 1989). Similarly, briefly displayed masked words, although they escaped explicit report, primed subsequent targets in an alexic patient.…”
Section: Residual Parallel Letter Perception?mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In particular, ERPs provide temporally and functionally specific measures of processing that may help circumvent limitations of the lexical decision and naming tasks that have been widely used to investigate language comprehension asymmetries. For instance, research with aphasic individuals suggests that the processes that support lexical decision and those that allow semantic classification are nonidentical (Bub & Arguin, 1995). Moreover, the speed and accuracy of lexical decision and naming often underestimate semantic processing capacity in the isolated right hemisphere of commisurotomy patients (Zaidel, 1990).…”
Section: Event-related Potentials and Cognitive Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%